Search results

Just like run-first was a anomaly. 400 carries for a feature back was a anomaly. You proceeded from my incorrect paraphrase, apologies. I myself haven't verified Statman's stats either.

You've seen the future and it will be.....

That's YOUR meter. Nobody else here ever made such a claim. BUT - I did misspeak - What I said. "But, we had a 100 percent success rate that season running Murray in short yardage" paraphrasing Statman was incorrect. I stand corrected. We had 100 percent success rate running the ball on plays...

He was keeping it 2 yards needed for the first down, since that was the situation on the highway robbery of a Dez catch.

I can go along with this. Despite how hard that is for me to do.

Minions can be reasonable. Just because there's many of them doesn't make them wrong. Or right. Or unreasonable, or not. It just means there are many of them and they all agree. When we repeat well known and well established fact, it's not burdenable. When YOU make like it's NOT well known and...

But as we can see in replays, Romo never looked anywhere but Dez. And again, i have no issue with his choice because that's what they were after, clearly. But, we had a 100 percent success rate that season running Murray in short yardage. Even when the opponent was stacked and blitzing. I'm not...

I stand corrected. I forgot we can always just plug Hershel Walker in, behind this line we have. (YukYuk) Make a move for what RB? Ray Rice?

See, this might be where there is a misunderstanding. I have no problem with Tony's choice there, given what came in to his helmet through the radio. I have the problem with what came in through the radio. I have the problem with no Murray in there as a threat at least. The first read and the...

You're making way too many assumptions as usual. In short yardage, the run and the short pass are higher percentage plays than the bomb. It's not something to prove, it's something most everyone knows. If you dispute it, prove it incorrect. You can only, truly speak for yourself. The "argument"...

Injuries at certain positions could be particularly devastating this season. RB is definitely one of those.

Not at all. I am asking because I don't see it. YOU wrote the rest of this into it. That... Dallas hardly ever does. And with Murray back there as a threat, the safeties cheat up. Wideout runs right by them. And it's NOT like they only take shots for Dez when he's singled up, they throw to him...

I kind of like the "step up or step out" attitude this shows from Dallas.

They did. They needed a TD not a 48 yd field goal. You can't pooch punt it there, GB would just run out the clock. Which is exactly what they ultimately did. They had no reasonable choice but to go for it on that particular 4th and 2. For about the fourth time, no one said there were any...

That's kinda what I just said, striking my own idea.

I am assuming the odds are better to convert with either a run or a short pass to Beasley (who was open) than getting the connect on the deep ball. NOT assuming we would actually convert, at all. Hey, it is okay with me if you guys and other people like the call. How come it's not okay if I...

Probably less odds than what can happen with a long pass play.

Cumberland College NEEDS you!

That to me strikes the idea that he was advised to destroy the phone.

That's already been charged and answered. I would have had no problem at all with a high percentage play there. We HAD to go for it in that situation - it's not like it was some bold decision. I thought about that too and if that was the plan it's only slightly better than getting just 7...