Search results

To this day, I'm not sure if he a) dogged it in Dallas, or b) was never very good to begin with.

Fine, but it's still an example of "greed." Later hours = higher ratings = greater advertising revenue.

Not age but rather location. Games/events pushed back later and later can be brutal on Eastern Time Zone dwellers like myself.

Pre-season games costing as much as reg season gamees: greed 18-game sked: greed Moving the NFL Draft to primetime: greed Thursday Night Football on cable only: greed Super Bowls no longer played in daylight: greed and so on

You know things are bad at the Zone when even homers are fleeing. Willkommen.

http://www.vibe.com/photo-gallery/new-sexy-30-hottest-celebrities-under-30?page=29

The Ticket says he has a lower back strain and is "week to week." Hopefully Kowalski will be fully healed five weeks from now.

Nate Newton was not kind to the o-line on his show today.

ironic

Like what? Media whining? True, we need more good posters, but less drama queens.

well done, Dez

C'mon. That's not fair. We have at least eight people here.

At the Zone, if you notice anything amiss with the team, you're accused of "overreacting." Praising the patchwork o-line after one less than dominant game would also qualify.

You're still laboring under the impression that the line looked good last night. They didn't. If they put together a month or two of solid play, the "haters" will have to eat some crow, but that remains to be seen.

There's no reason to stop the so-called "hate." The line still looks dreadful. And not all realists think alike.

I don't think he truly believes that Jerry or the scouts are "vindicated" after one game. I think he just enjoys winding people up. :whistle

The "realist" point of view is that there's enough talent on this team to finish with a winning record despite mediocre players in the trenches. A winning team, but not a championship team. I saw nothing last night to change that. Even Jerry's fiercest critics didn't think we'd go 0-16.