Search results

and "must watch!" on their website. no class.

the Green Bay game two years ago, when he became pass happy with a big lead. then there was freezing the kicker in Arizona ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4niph4M9M3A

sorry about your mom. sad that it took her illness to make you a Dallas fan.

the play that triggered a forum civil war

wtf is wrong with McFadden? he's hurt before the first practice?

when Player X tears his ACL, please post the devastating news here. thx

surprised he jaked it despite the fact he had a golden opportunity for more playing time with Murray gone. i am disappoint, son.

his goal will be to get a temporary injunction and kick this down the road to next spring or something. proving irreparable harm to his career or likelihood to succeed on the merits will be tough, though.

Mike's ego could handle a fading Anthony Miller, but not local hero Brown. besides, we still had Harper under contract for one more year, so the timing wasn't right.

my only issue is that if you see one-on-one coverage and only need two yards, a slant or a comeback route would seem a safer option than a bomb. throwing deep in that situation certainly had the element of surprise, but I would have preferred a higher percentage pass.

Dbair is cutting your car brakes as we speak.

I remember taking the VHS tape out of the VCR, going up to my bedroom, and doing some silent fist-pumps. :lol If you were old enough to remember the pain from The Catch, the '92 Champ Game was incredibly cathartic/satisfying.

But not 21st century good. He would have been playing in an era when you could clothesline QB's, and the passing game was de-emphasized (WRs in the three point stance). Oh sure, but Weeden could have won that 1972 SB vs Washington just by handing off and throwing high percentage passes. Griese...

drinking and needlepoint

Romo had to beat out a failed baseball player (Henson), a druggie (Carter), an aging Testaverde and an immobile, pick-happy fossil (Bledsoe). Would a team in the 1960s/70s have been as patient with him? Craig Morton, in his prime and coming off a Super Bowl, presented a much stiffer test for...

Yeah, I'm not talking about plucking a 240 lb offensive lineman from 1960 and watching him get steamrolled by today's players. I'm saying that if Unitas or Staubach had been born the same year as Romo, their greatness would still be intact and their stats would put the old ones to shame...

yes, well, there are plenty of QBs today who put up eye-popping numbers, but that doesn't put them in the same "stratosphere" as Roger or Unitas. lies, damn lies, and ....

why is it "silly" or inconceivable that Unitas and Staubach, who played in an era when you could decapitate the QB and mug their wide receivers, would be as good or better than Romo if they had the same modern-day advantages like nutrition, year-round training, superior equipment, video...