Search results

Compilation of stuff I recorded back in the day. Covers the divorce and Barry's hiring. Special guest appearance by Skip Bayless! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcUPm0-HC1Y&feature=youtu.be

Say goodnight, Gracie.

Beats me. Maybe he took offense at being questioned. Maybe he tried to run away but Z grabbed his arm. Maybe Z pulled a gun on him prior to the skirmish. That's for the trial to resolve. Z made two big mistakes: not obeying the cops' advice to stay put and not intervene, and running around the...

He inflicted those injuries on himself? Again, even if Z initiated the physical part of the confrontation (doubtful), he didn't deserve to die for his poor judgment.

Why would he attack TM knowing the cops were only minutes away? Indeed, who calls the cops if they intend to commit any type of crime, let alone murder?

My theory is that Martin thought that creepy, older Z was making some sort of gay pass at him, and reacted poorly.

We're not talking about a splinter here. He was attacked to the point of a broken nose and bleeding from his head. Was he supposed to wait until his brains spilled out onto the sidewalk? Would you in a similar situation? Get real.

Define "instigator"? Did Z deserve to be attacked just because he stopped or questioned Martin? He had a Constitutional right to do exactly that. If I criticize a fellow driver in Walmart's parking lot for taking up two spaces, does he have a right to kick my head in just because I initiated the...

I object. Judge: "Sustained."

Get back to me when your head is being slammed into concrete by someone younger and stronger than you. lol Z's critics first said he had no injuries, and now they're saying they're no big deal. You really gotta get your stories straight. Yes, I'm aware the state has pro-TM witnesses, but Z...

He's saying that the only way for Z to beat the rap is for his team to prove that he acted in self-defense.

Ok, now I get what you're saying. To me, poking holes in the state's case is not the same as accepting a burden of proof, but whatever.

He has the photos and medical reports. He doesn't really need them anymore to prove that his life was threatened. And he still has witnesses in his corner who back up his side of the story--witnesses who haven't done a sudden 180.

His story hasn't changed; theirs have. The only thing damaged is the witnesses' credibility.

Changing stories create "doubt" in the average juror's mind. Doubt = Z skips.

? If the state is filing charges, the burden of proof is on them. Hell, Z doesn't even have to take the stand. Assuming he has a competent attorney, the witnesses' evolving stories will be attacked on cross.

lol Punk: judge, jury and executioner

Yes, we all know that. Now we have to determine if Z had cause to.