Search results

ROY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good job Brookings.

Looked like Daniels jumped into him.

Just because a defender is not looking for the ball, the receiver shouldn't be able to jump into them and grab them and have it called PI on the defender.

HE GRABBED BROOKINGS!

This is why you have to go Wade. You lack killer instinct. You're too much of a pussy to go for the jugular. Same shit with Gailey, Campo, and now you.

And now we go to sleep.

Damn Ratliff.

Now I saw a block in the back that was done on Ware.

I can forgive Jerry for passing on an Olineman for getting Dez.

UNFUCKING BELIEVABLE!!!

Ok I understand that. But a 3 and out accomplishes the exact same thing on a different portuion of the field.

Now those kid of blocks by the Cowboys get penalized as block in the back.

Not really. Some WRs are able to adjust like Bryant almost did. Never said ti was a perfect pass.

Based on what? What if a team is driving down the field and they are on our 15 yard line and we get an INT or a fumble recovery and return for minimal gain, but then fail to score on that turnover? How does that help the odds?

And anothert thing... they SCORED OFF OF THAT TURNOVER. Which like I said, means nothing in getting turnovers IF you don't score.

I understand that. But you are claiming that had we gotten turnovers, we would have won.

It was no body's fault on that play. Maybe Romo could have not thrown it so tight towards the sideline, but other than that it was a good throw and a good attempt by Bryant.

NO WE DID NOT. If you don't convert those turnovers into POINTS then it doesn't mean anything. If that's the case, then what number of turnovers was needed? Are you saying that if he had just at least gotten ONE TURNOVER in each of those two games... we would have won those two games? That's...

What about illegal contact after 5 yards by the defender?