Search results

They listed him as the #29 PLAYER, not sure as in WR. I think the players took into account his return ability in which he is one of the most electrifying returnmen in the game along with his receiving skills in which he is also the most electrifying home run hitting players. But from a purist...

You seem to have an understanding on our cap situation, what's your take on this? I got it off another board. Are your numbers different? 9/9/2010: Signed a seven-year, $57.168 million contract. The cap-conscious deal contains $18 million guaranteed -- no signing bonus but all of Austin's...

If Bowen was going to play somewhere cheap, then it wouldn't make sense to go to Washignton.

Actually it's Calvin Watkins.

I'd be for getting rid of him. He's a progress stopper.

This is an ignorant claim. Say what you want about Roy, however he did put up better numbers than Avant. Wish he would have expounded more on how both Maclin and Jackson are more talented than Austin. Fact is, the Cowboys could easily have 3 players (Austin, Bryant, and Witten) with 1,000+ yard...

Even before Free?

Don't you have a wedding to plan for, now that New York allows your kind to marry without requiring residency?

If Rob Ryan's defense is cracked up to be as advertised and he will have Ware moving about all over the place, Ware if healthy should snag at least 20 sacks---maybe break the record, but he could becoem the first player in NFL history to have had two 20 sack seasons. What I like most about Ware...

Growing pains how? Did the Cowboys undergo growing pains with Wade's 3-4 from Parcells' 3-4?

Are you freaking serious? For a guy over 30. I don't get all this love for Jenkins. I think he benefitted greatly from Capers' system. The fact that they are willing to let him walk, tells me enough; enough to leave him be.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/dallas-cowboys/09000d5d82077b9a/Top-100-DeMarcus-Ware?continuous=true And it would not be complete with words from Cowboy-hater Marshall Faulk.

Barry couldn't get it done in the playoffs. See this is what fools like you all miss. Barry was great during the regular season but stunk it up in the playoffs. You cannot be considered better than Emmitt or the best, if you could not get it done in the playoffs as well as in the regular season...

I've made this argument plenty of times against hypocrites. The same argument that they make for Barry, why can it not be made for say... Steve Largent and/or James Lofton? Steve Largent had Jim Zorn as his QB for the majority of his career, and Dave Krieg. Krieg was no slouch, but he was no...

Allow me to piggy-back off with Thomas Jones. Let's forget about the Cowboys and Emmitt for a moment, because Barry fans just keep bringing up the o-line excuse. Let's look at Thomas Jones in 2006, had --- no dominate WRs (Barry had Moore 123 rec., Perriman 108 rec., and Morton 48 rec.) ---...

You forgot Derric Lassic, afterall, he was the starter for those two games. But look you laughing fool, you're the one that said: So all I did, was present a scenario where not that Emmitt was stopped, but was altogether out of the equation. So "ayuh", the Cowboys had Lassic, Agee, and...

Uh no. It had to do with Barry's impatience, like I said.

WRONG. I like Moose Johnston as much as any Cowboys' fan, but Matt Suhey of the Bears was better, and was as important to Peyton as Johnston was to Emmitt. But when those two: Emmitt and Walter got into the red zone (goal line), they were not taken out and replaced by either of their FBs. As...

Sure you did. Just like you watched Sam Young for all four years of his career at Notre Dame, because you are a big time Notre Dame fan.

Uh no, but becuase of his impatience in not allowing his blocks to set up. That's why you could not put Barry behind Emmitt's Oline that was far less agile and athletic than Barry's Oline. If Barry was impatient with his zone blocking scheme, he would be even moreso with Emmitt's Oline.