Search results

I'm not sayiong that they won't make the playoffs, I'm just saying just because they won the division this past year, doesn't make it a slam dunk that they will win it this year. When we won the division in 2009, who all thought that the Cowboys would win the division again, and who all thought...

Ray Edwards is shit. He had that one good game agaisnt us in the p[layoffs, and try to parlay that into a big time long-term contract with the Vikings. The Vikings weren't biting though. Edwards had a good game against a gimpy Colombo. 10 times out of 10, a healthy Colombo would mop the floor...

In 2009, the Cowboys lost these 6 starters: T.O., Williams (safety), Henry, Zach Thomas, Canty, and Ellis. After coming off a 9-7 and failing to make the playoff season. And what happened? They went 11-5 and won the division. Does anybody doubt that had Garrett coached the team all of last year...

If you watched NFC East football in the past 5 years, then you would know that the team that won the division the year before, didn't win it the following year. In fact, that team failed to even make the playoffs.

We went with Sensy in 2009.

Grossman for now. But knowing Shanny, I can see him switching up and going with a different QB in wk. 3 with the attempt of trying to gain some sort of advantage.

LOL. I do and the capitals. But only someone like you from a trailer park would be impressed with that.

Not true. We can do without a vet WR moreso than a guard. We had a a vet #3 WR and he netted 500+ yards. With Witten, Austin, and Miles getting the looks, the 4th receiver whether the 3rd WR or the 2nd TE as in Bennett, more than likely will net the same and Bennett is certainly capable of...

We don't need a vet WR. If anything, we need a vet guard.

If it gets Olshansky out of Dallas, I'm for it.

But you're ready to put him on the PS right this very moment. Time on the roster will help as well. I don't know if he is a good ST or not, and apparently neither do you, hence why youa re asking.

It works for New Hampshire as well.

I don't think it's the opposite at all. That's you making a stupid leap for the sake of looking or trying to create a debate where none exist, essentially to attempt to jerk a chain and be an asshole. I just wanted him to explain why Radway should be on the PS, especially at this early juncture...

Why should Radway be on the PS and not active roster? What if we took that same mentality and applied it Romo and Austin, where would we be? Because what did either of them do initially to warrant a roster spot and not on the PS?

Holmgren has taken over that team, and the Browns are pretty much like the Lions, in that they will be interesting to watch.

It'd be foolish to NOT have Geathers make this roster. Him and Lissemore and Brent could make a very stout Dline one day.

Sorry, not going to happen. The Eagles will make a trade with either Vick or Young to the Raiders for... wait for it... a 2nd round pick.

Man do you ever hold firm to a position? LOL.

Funny, because last season, I saw a pulling Davis, get rocked and have his helmet come off by a player that was also 5'11 and gave up 80 lbs. to Davis. Costa is a scrapper.

Yeah and...? What was the contract that Williams, and Davis signed? Also I think it was signed in 2008. He is guaranteed about $20 million in the first three years of the contract---they front loaded it. And this is the third year of that guarantee. With his injury and age, I don't see them...