Search results

Leary wasn't blocking; he was holding on for dear life with one arm. I love how obvious penalties are no longer obvious when Dallas commits them.

so what? the point is that "turning the shoulders" is not necessary to draw a flag for holding a defensive lineman or any other player

Leary was no longer blocking at that point. he was using one arm to impede Suh's path to Romo. tugging on a WR's jersey from behind, which slows him down but doesn't "turn his shoulders," is still holding

aka, the truth. the NFL called it a blatant hold and they were right. when the NFL apologizes to Dallas for missing a Detroit penalty, I'll get right on it

Not really. Even with Leary holding, Suh managed to get a hand on Tony as he released the ball. Absent the hold, Tony would have been clobbered.

this win is starting to feel like a faulty ATM dispensing money for free

MB4 watching the Zapruder film: "What brain and bone matter? You crazy."

what are you implying? that the call could have gone either way?

the debate, not the actual game. duh.

game over

absofuckinglutely. he made contact before the ball arrived and without playing the ball. lemme send you this tardy Xmas gift

the person with the best view of the play threw the flag. why he was overruled is anyone's guess.

well that was stupid. did you expect her not to eat it?

did you send me a Pepperidge Farm cheese platter or a big fat black woman?

right, so you know more than the NFL head of officiating and 99% of Americans who watched that play in real time. hi-larious.

woulda coulda shoulda. don't act like it wasn't a huge gift.

I never insinuated that, but it sure as hell made the comeback easier/manageable. Well, that and the shitty punt.

that's why they don't throw flags based on still photos. :rolleyes

Correct, which means you no longer have a case. Do you agree that Dez was very lucky not to get a personal foul for going onto the field to rant at the officials?