Search results

Is Garrett not there? If not, I'm officially saying "smokescreen".

Side note, I absolutely cannot believe they hired Mike Lombardi. :mindblown:

It would suck watching Orton do anything knowing he's nothing but a JAG stopgap. If anything, we should have seen if anyone would give us any kind of pick for him. Maybe we could've essentially bought a mid-round pick from a QB desperate team like the Chiefs or Cards.

Sounds good but this is scary stuff. Never heard about this before.

I bet the Vikes would do that in a heartbeat if they were ready to give up on Ponder, which I'm sure they aren't. I wouldn't be happy with a 23 and a 25 for Romo.

Again, the Bears didn't get rid of Olsen because he can't play. They got rid of him because Mike Martz is allergic to tight ends. Martz leaves, you need the position again.

Hate to repeat myself, but if we had an experienced coach who knew what he was doing and had seen enough players over the years to properly judge the current roster, and he wanted to blow it up? Then I'd be all for it. If a Jeff Fisher, a Holmgren, a John Fox came in here and said look Jerry...

Can't get that image of him hobbling to the endzone with that INT last year out of my head. Looked seriously painful. Can't imagine he has much left or the Bears would keep him.

Speaking of, anyone heard about any interest on him? I haven't on him or Felix, not that I've looked for it.

Right, two words: Mike Martz.

I don't mind that we kept him, because it's not like his roster spot meant anything last year anyway. But how much did he even practice to judge him? Very little IIRC. I think they just kept him because he was a draft pick they liked. Which again is fine. I just don't know how much he...

Agree we've drafted better since 2010, but we sure last year was so great? It's still up in the air whether Claiborne is all that.

We shuffle around some assistant coaches, cut a few JAG vets, point out how we only lost by 11 to the eventual Superbowl champs, and we're all good? :jerry

LOL No birds because they've all been eaten... And not on just any day. On Tuesday. LOL :WTF

So we should draft for need? That ususally works. Remember when we passed on McCoy because we had Barber and Felix?

Naw, I'd be kind of pumped. The guy is a huge playmaker. As bad as we suck in the red zone, maybe more 20+ yard TDs is the answer. I don't have a lot of faith that Garrett would utilize him the best, though. He seems to struggle with anything outside the box.

He might not make it to their pick... Seems like an overpay for Seattle unless they think they have the migraine issue solved, which I doubt they do.

I'd go Frederick. Maybe Warford but I agree with Parcells that C is really important and you can get by with other guards.

Seems more and more people are thinking this... If he's really that good, I'm not gonna complain if we wait on O-line.

LOL