Search results

It is San Francisco.:gay

From your mocks, it's pretty well-noted that you don't favor/value Romo. Let's not give Romo any protection; however, let's give him another weapon at WR. Brilliant. More CBs... just what we need. With a 3rd roudner at that.

Alot of those players got snubbed over the years, and this might be there year. But why should Allen have to pay for it? And superpunk... I'm sorry, but I think if Allen gets snubbed it has less to do with it being a "strong class", but perhaps moreso him being a Dallas Cowboy. There is no first...

Don't you mean SLB? I was under the impression that Carter would be the WLB or Will.

I'm hoping this means that Mike Tice will be coming in as OL coach.

Explain how they are different aside from field position? Aside from the mechanics... what exactly is different from a INT, a fumble, and a 3 and out punt? I'm waiting. The optics look worse with INTs and a fumble because those often results from recklessness or miscalculation, whereas with...

No it isn't. But I'm through trying to explain something that really does not need explaining.

I don't think Larry Allen was much of an athlete.

Like the Cooper Taylor for safety---had my eye on him, yet I just think he is way too tall. Reminds me of Schweigert from Purdue. He might be better served as a WR.

Gee... how many days later? It took you that long to come up with that answer... and it's still weak. It depedns on the punter, but so what? WHO CARES. It still adds up to the same thing, you the only one that seems incapable of grasping this simple idea. And the fact that it took you days later...

Uncle Tom. No. Try Brotha Nat. As in Nat Turner.

I hate whomever does those stupid gang signs. I'm sure it's going to happen if it hasn't already, but you might have some deaf person using ASL, and some idiot gang-banger shoots them down, because they think that deaf person is "throwing up gang signs".

If we were to sign Melton, and we have Price onboard, then with Hatcher, that interior DL unit becomes a bit more of a strength, and could allow the Cowboys to focus more on OL in the draft.

That add up to the SAME THING IDIOT. Of course you can't grasp that. If an offense throws and INT, or fumbles, or goes 3 and out and PUNTS, or turns the ball over on downs... WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE? They add up to the exact same thing: the offense failed to score on that possession, and ball is...

I want BETTER than average; but yet, average would be BETTER than what we already have.

How many points did we make off of turnovers with a short field? Garrett's offense seemed to always stall in the red zone, and if not he lacked the inability to sustain drives. I'm not so hung up on turnovers as in fumble recoveries or INTs. If you think about it, punts/3 and outs can be...

I'm sorry but I don't agree with this shit, especially it coming from Kiper. I don't associate trading up or down with being a bad GM. One has nothing to do with the other. How many times have the Pats traded down and accumulated picks? Was trading up from #21 to #17, that netted Emmitt SMith...

What good would it have been if the Cowboys' defense created turnovers, and then the offense pisses it away? The lack of turnovers had nothing to do with YOU, Garrett and your inability to score more than 10 points in the first half, but only one time.

You don't have to convince me of Williams, I was already on tha tbandwagon before the rest of you all. Sadly, I think you are correct, this looks like a typical Dallas draft where they ignore the blatant obvious holes because UJerry doesn't want to come across as being desparate. Last year's...

Chance Warmack and Bjoern Warner would be available but instead you take Sylvester Williams?:WTF