Search results

Jerry isn't moving on, that ship has sailed. We'd have to lose out for that to even be a possibility, and that isn't happening. Norm Hitzges nailed it on the postgame show. Going into this year, Jerry's worst nightmare was the team going 7-9 or so and having to figure out how to sell Garrett...

SP isn't here anymore, so I guess that's true.

Mark Sanchez is your tiebreaker.

Exactly. Couldn't agree more. If nothing else, look at Seattle tapes and use him just like Wilson. Which is mostly as a passer, but those 5-6-7 runs a game can be backbreakers for defenses. And you still roll him out and move him some. If you made Russell Wilson into a Troy Aikman-type...

We definitely should win. I feel better about this game than the Giants one. If we lose to Mark Sanchez when they're travelling on a short week, it's a major, major fail.

Yep, it's him. You knew there was a new sheriff in town when we got down 21-0 to the Rams and kept running it. In years past, Garrett used any deficit, even one TD, as an excuse to start throwing. He'd even say as much in the PC. This commitment to running also shows how mind-numbingly...

On the one hand, Gruden is right about RG3's fundamentals. Saw him play some yesterday for the first time in a while and he looks skittish and unsure of himself, and his footwork is lousy. On the other hand, I don't know that Gruden has the skins on the wall to come out and blast his QB like...

:lol

That was a done deal weeks ago anyway... Probably after the Seattle game.

I loved how tonight when we called time out before a key third down play, Romo was talking with Linehan and someone else, maybe Weeden, and Garrett was standing about 6 feet away just observing. :lol

I guess maybe I'm more objective because I'm more detached than I used to be, but I always expected us to win because when Tony is on it literally only takes a few plays to put it in the endzone. I mean, it was only 11 points. Not like it was 24 or something. Or no, it's not that I'm any more...

:lol

Mike Pettine def not building Cleveland for the long term

I'm glad someone else sees it that what because from what I've seen, this crop of QBs pretty much sucks.

Heh, yeah I am. I'd almost bet on the Giants, too, because this has all the makings of an upset. But like mid said (gawd I hate agreeing with him so much), Giants might be in too much disarray. And have too many injuries.

No Peterson?

^ Yep. Their crowd sounds really loud, too. Mallett shitting the bed.

It's too bad the great game they gave the Steelers on MNF probably prevented any Eagles let down. And holy shat, Danny Amendola just returned a kickoff about 80 yards. Can't believe that guy is still in the league and making plays.

I didn't get the Eagles, I got Texans-Bengals. Curious to see how Mallett does. As big a fool as he acted before his draft, maybe he's matured. The guy had as big an arm as anyone. Also, surely the Lions will lose in New England, which should help us.

I know, I'm glad Garrett introduced this innovative One Day at a Time philosophy. Never heard any other coach say that before.