Search results

So what's the story behind this? Is this the same crazy guy from Wichita?

This is why I started that thread a while ago asking what people were seeing in Street. I know you don't like Williams, but Street is not any bigger, and he's slower. He was a 5th round pick while TW was a 3rd round pick for a reason. And it's not like Street put on some impressive show last...

McFadden isn't on Peterson's level. Not even close. One is a huge bust who can't stay healthy and gets outproduced by no-names, and the other is an all-time great.

Okay, say one good game, then. I know he was hurt, but still, it's one good game out of 17. Far from a proven anything.

DE might be a strength later in the year -- might be. But early in the year when Hardy is suspended and Gregory's 230-lb butt doesn't know what he's doing, it won't be. I for one am not sold on Lawrence, either. He's getting way too much credit for one play against Detroit.

I'd do it. This fragile RB situation is one of the few things that could keep us from a great chance at winning it all. Said it before, but if the running game struggles, we start passing more. Then maybe a couple breaks don't go our way (which we're probably due for after last year) and...

:nsis

Hate it. Nothing wrong with PATs being a formality. So we want kickers having more impact on the games? I'm sure they're trying to encourage more 2 point tries, or something.

What is this?

Again, just shows how lucky we've been to have Romo.

I think he's saying Romo is a franchise QB, and Garrett has had one winning season with him. Or if you want to go back to when he was OC, had two playoff wins in eight years.

Jerry Jones, Rod Marinelli: Cowboys' defensive line now a strength By Jared Dubin | NFL Writer May 15, 2015 9:49 am ET After cutting DeMarcus Ware last offseason, the Dallas Cowboys had to make do with a bunch of castoffs and late-round picks along their defensive line for most of the 2014...

Yeah, but a lot of people actually believe it was all part of the master plan that took eight years before it could be put into practice.

Dodger knocking it out of the park as usual.

Agree again. That's my problem with people comparing Murray vs Randle highlights or per-carry stats or whatever: Murray was physically beat up to hell the last third or so of the year. That's why he looked slower and didn't break as many tackles as he could have. Give Randle those same...

Same here, j. I was a huge fan of his in college, but it's only looking back at it that I realize those were the first days of that wildcat look with the constant jet sweep action (with Felix) that defenses hadn't yet adjusted to, so he had huge holes to run through. Like you say, he gets...

Did Dooms hack Sheik's account?

If he has huge holes, he can get through them and get more yards than Murray got. He just gets tackled so easily with those toothpick legs. And I doubt he can stay healthy.

I think the whole giving out of numbers to re-create great old players is stupid. If Dez really wants 88 and it's available, okay, I guess. But assigning them to rookies is who may not even want them is just Jerry marketing gobbledygook. Give the players the number they want and if they turn...

Kenny "Stand Them Up" Bishop, obvs.