Search results

I heard the interview live this morning. Troy said he was a big Murray fan because of his toughness and attitude and professionalism, and he thinks we'll miss that this year. He said no, he doesn't believe you can put just any back behind even a good OL and get the same results. Basically...

Issues? Hos? Who is this? Never even heard of him.

:lol I don't think it really matters -- he obviously knows the offense like the back of his hand and it worked last year. I am a little surprised, though, because I thought he was fine a full year+ post-surgery. My guess is he could do it, but they figure why change from last year.

Since the thread is here... Anyone surprised a little that he's still taking Wednesdays off? I wonder if that's more almost-superstition since last year went so well, or if they really think he physically still needs to do that.

:lol

:lol Of course.

Don't know all the details but I think we're NFC favorites. Maybe clear favorites. And I've thought for months it's the Colts in the AFC even though they're flawed. Second pick is Broncos but I'll go Colts. Previous Super Bowl loss avenged.

Glad to see you're finally acknowledging the great jobs Zimmer and Fisher are doing

They're definitely throwing a bunch of crap against the wall. It's about like Nascar now with new rules every single year. But the game didn't become the monster it did because it needed a bunch of stuff changed. Goodell is the definition of a guy who was born of third base and thinks he hit...

I don't think the PAT was broken in the first place. Who cares if it's a formality, a TD should be worth more than two FGs anyway. And like Zero said, don't think we want to be making kickers even more influential than they already are.

This. Also, that pic bb posted should be a bannable offense.

Everlasting, come down off that cross so we can build a bridge to make a fire... :greenballoon

:lol

Well the Giants do suck. They weren't that great before, and they've had a lot of injuries.

Speaking of reasonable... You really think it's reasonable to assume that Matt Jones and Jeremy Langford, who were picked not many picks after Chaz, were 5th rounders? Or that Cobb or Ajayi or Williams were 6th rounders? Everyone else in the NFL got it that wrong, but our draft board...

My god, look at all the haters, gloomers, and negative nellies on this board. Only 100% think the Cowboys will win.

Cowboys win easily. Giants score some points but their defense is an absolute dumpster fire.

Really? It's not reasonable to ask for a mid-round pick for one of the key components to our success last year? It's nitpicking to ask our RB to be more than Joseph Randle and a bunch of cast-offs? Okay.

Never said anything about cancelling the season. But I don't think using a mid-round draft pick on such an important position would have been a reactionary knee-jerk decision, either. In fact I think it would have been quite "reasonable."

Yep, and now his spawn has guaranteed job security as well. Another reason it irritates me when he talks about competition, accountability, etc. He's made, and has never had to worry about anything here. And yeah, the bitterness in Broaddus was evident in the video. I wasn't a Parcells...