Search results

So Broaddus is saying that the DL were playing with their pad level too high. That's one reason I mentioned Lampkin's (for Rams) height. He had great tape. But GM's shied away because of his height. But he always wins the leverage game because of it.

We aren't winning the SB anyway. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! So unless you're into just winning games, what's the difference?

Didn't know he is considered a starter.

I'd tell Jerry to just stick with Grier. I've seen worse. We need our picks!

Did Mazi play?

The Rams opened up holes with Lampkin at center, who was a guy that supposedly many teams had as undraftable because of his height.

And also that's the play that got Milton hurt, WTF. Here's a hint, Jerry. If the Pats don't want the guy, if the Niners don't want the guy, then chances are the guy isn't all that good. GMs don't "do a solid" for a player. They don't trade away good QBs for a song and a dance.

Just there, Milton held, held, held, then fired a fast ball.

Why is it that the deeper the Rams go into their depth chart, the better Milton looks? Oh well, if the kid can learn to get the ball out faster he has a shot. He certainly has more talent than Rush, but he has to control that arm and play like he has a weak arm so he gets it out faster instead...

At the midpoint of the season, I am using the traditional game 8. The Cowboys went 3-4 (they had a bye week). After week 9 they were 3-5 (loss to Atlanta). At that point, there was a mathematical shot at the first pick in the draft had Dallas continued to lose. They would have ended up 3-14...

You have got to be kidding me. Yes, there was a point in the season when Dallas had a shot at the top pick Stop being a fucking idiot!

Should and do have different definitions. What should be done is not the same as what is done.

There was actually a shot at getting the number one pick. You are naïve if you do not think players tank. They do, regardless of what people in the press like Mickey say. They do. They just do it in a way that is not obvious. You live in a fairy tale. Do you know any actual NFL players? I...

IMHO, it is not a "slightly better pick". Each draft only has a relative handful of true blue chip prospects. It depends on the draft each year, but usually there aren't more than maybe 10 players who have a shot at being a HOF type player. Sometimes you get lucky and the player falls. Like...

What's your point? I'm talking about the Seahawks being in the thick of it to win the division. You're the one who threw the Super Bowl. But the Seahawks have made many changes. So nobody yet knows how those changes will work out. I like what the Seahawks have done-especially at the QB...

Not in my mind. I would have sat him sooner because I wanted more losses. Jeanty would be assured of being a Cowboy. Sometimes "dirty decisions" need to be made for the future good.

You are entitled to your opinion, but no, he was not. Just listen to people like Laufenberg, Aikman, etcetera, who know Garrett personally and know the inside story. From time to time they open up and talk about it and you can tell that Garrett wasn't always getting the type of players that he...

Read the context! From winning the division.

Not really, IMO. Unless Henry has lost it. They have an OL that can easily convert to smash mouth and Rush would just need to manage the game. They've got a good D too. They also have a kicker who can win them games 6-0.

I don't think Garrett was all that bad. I think there were things that happened that are directly the fault of Jerry Jones and Garrett had to do his best to mend it. I think Garret wanted to get rid of Dez Bryant and that is why Dez has a beef with him. Coaches like Dooley were exhausted with...