Search results

I don't think that's ever existed or ever will.

That's nothing addressing what I said. That's all stuff you made up and attributed to me. I SAID they are reminiscent of the 92 Cowboys and they are. They REMIND you of them. If you're watching. I never said or even thought they were all-time great. They haven't actually DONE anything yet.

If you ain't watchin' 'em you wouldn't know.

Huh?

Just like today with Miller, Haley was a bonus as we already had the hay in the barn. Wouldn't call him a missing piece that without it we don't win da soup bow.

Reminiscent of the '92 Cowboys. Brilliant defensive HC, superstar QB with a big arm, hustling, hard hitting defense. Swagger.

1 and 1 is 3.

Are the Egals really that good? Or are the Vikes that pathetic?

Egals slappin Vikes around. 24-7 at half.

That ain't why I picked us to beat Cincy. LOL

Hell yeah there were indictments!

For congressional oversight hearings AND grand jury investigations, yep! But, neither can find guilt or otherwise adjudicate in any way. That's for the courtroom only.

It wasn't the same forum. Starr was leading the grand jury, not Congress knuckleheads.

Man I don't think so. I think he's a free agent that's gonna command giga-millions

Ken Starr was a special prosecutor appointed BY Billy Clinton. Unlike what you're seeing here, there was no political witch hunt going on. Starr was diligent and went where the facts and the evidence took him.

Man... Listening to Sean Payton for 30 minutes every Monday on Cowherd makes you smarter. There's your next Dallas HC, if Jerruh has even half a brain.

Pretty sure it falls under 18 USC, 1001 of federal law.

If you lie to Congress it's a major felony period. No need to be sworn in. Same with lying to an FBI agent. On paper this hearing was simply oversight, with possibility of the committee referring people to the justice department for prosecution. In practice it's just political theater, with...

1-1 it is.

LOL