Search results

Its not a matter of getting getting paid its what he is going to get paid that I have an issue with. Already having him tagged has locked up $15M we could have used somewhere else.

Pretty sure Jerry knew Emmitt was the real deal what with coming off a Super Bowl and a rushing title I believe but I don't remember the hold up with him I'm pretty sure he knows Dak ain't the real deal which is why he got tagged

Have to agree here that actions speak louder than words. If Jerry felt this guy was the real deal this contract would already have been done.

Not the limiting factor but part of the issue. They touch the ball the most and have the most influence on outcome of games. I'm not saying Dak is underachieving but I have zero interest in a "stat" QB who leads us to 8-8, 9-7 every year. Thats Stafford territory, ultimate mediocrity. I'm sure...

Sadly no I wasn't against the Romo contract because I felt he was just are best option at the time and there were no other scenarios represented. I posted that my buddy who works at the Four Seasons ran into Brandin Cooks and he noted that was the case based on when they were doing there work...

We shall see but the QB is part of it...

When certain routes cannot be implemented into the offense then yes he is limiting what the offense can do. Plus, last years numbers were all fluff. Romo had plenty of years like that and it always wound up in the same way...complete underachievement when it mattered most, in the playoffs!!! I...

Have a buddy who works at the Four Seasons in Maui and he gets a lot of NFL players there and is always chatting them up Recently talked to Brandin Cooks and he said that Dak is the 3rd worry when defenses start scouting the opponent...also that we need to retain Cooper and b/c Dak's arm is...

Yes I believe you are correct as this contract has $5M more in guarantees than what was previously being reported at the beginning of the season...still less than Wentz or Wilson in guarantees so lets watch this egomaniac believe he should get more than them...

I've seen a little more restraint than daddy but I would agree that the apple may not be falling far from the tree...

Well we all know what the way out but Mr. Reaper needs to help us out...

Thought (and just like Jerry this came to me in the shower)... Place the tag on Dak and start talking to one of the teams picking high in this draft (Miami, Chargers etc...) and see if we can't convince them to take Dak and swap draft position. Or just tag and look to trade him. I heard Nick...

You can kiss any thoughts of reaching a Super Bowl if this happens. Dak has no fucken' leverage I don't get it. We essentially are bidding against ourselves with Dak and somehow this FO seems to always lose that bidding war!!!! The Chiefs moved off Smith to get Mahomes and we should be in that...

I also wouldn't mind going after Herbert. This reminds of the Chiefs getting Mahomes when they had Alex Smith and Dak ain't even close to that yet. They had the foresight to not stand pat when something better presented itself. Gottlieb thinks as you that we should make a play for Tua. I wonder...

I keep hearing that he has leverage and I don't get it based on exactly what you outlined. He proved shit last year. Now if he had done what Wentz did last year that is someone you consider paying but with what Dak had at his disposable he had to do better and just didn't. When he signs I'm...

Realistically who would you go for based on our position? Would you try to wheel and deal to move up? I'm hearing a lot of noise on Jordan Love...

It really depends on how Dak is viewed around the league and whether or not someone believes he's the kind of QB that can elevated the people around him. I have yet to see that which is why I doubt anyone gives up 2 first round picks though 1 first rounder would be doable. If we sign him to...

Appreciate the clarification so I would non-exclusive tag Dak and see if a team bites but 2 first rounders ain't going to happen...if it were just one then maybe. I'm still of the thought that we cannot hamstring the franchise by paying this guy with the upper tier quarterbacks but my concern...

Well none but I thought the non-exclusive tag would only require 1 first rounder? If its 2 first rounders then forget it, no one is going to give that up for Dak.

Just for clarity's sake I thought the non-exclusive tag carried only 1 first rd pick and like a 2nd or a 3rd? I thought the exclusive tag is where the 2 first rounders came from? Regardless I'm in on the non-exclusive tag b/c I think some team might be ok giving up 1 first rounder for Mr...