Search results

It's not my Christianity. ;) In your off target shout-out you're quoting one of the greatest Gospel expositors, who does a much better job of it than I ever will. As for who burns in hell, I'll wisely leave that to Jesus, where it belongs. Any way, why worry? There is no God, remember? You...

:lol I meant in general, but yeah, ben really managed to piss off a usually tolerable group. The new Pope seems like a good guy in a Revelation Ch 17 kind of way... :whistle

I think he was just trying to cheer you up. Not a lot laughs going around these days.

Rand Paul's response: Link

I'm no fan of Apple as a company and the ass clowns could still turn a sweet profit while keeping jobs local instead of outsourcing slave labor. But I'm even less of a fan of 'committees' gathering together like wolves to shake down every and anybody to squeeze out the last penny. Maybe we're...

An intellectual calamity is so much more appealing than a simple solution. The idea of complicated = intellectualism has only allowed people not really involved in the process to feel intelligent by association simply by nodding agreement to awful ideas. We can pretend we're on an up-tick simply...

:lol Sure, Paul should know better; there's no convincing people that their own good doesn't lie with government oversight. It's too easy to look for a handout.

Link

:lol

Shitty Verizon too? breitbart

:lol That's East Coast organized crime speak. No matter what it's called, it's the same in all places and reliable in keeping the bosses image, if not clean, overly dirty.

Needed to in getting directly involved no. Being benefitted by it, of course. He doesn't need to be involved. The Capo doesn't have to be involved with day to day affairs which get his hands dirty; he has his Consigliere's who know his general ethics and wishes and can disseminate the matters of...

Thanks. Never really studied any of Nixon's story...

I honestly don't know, if such influence had been used under a Republican administration. It's not unreasonable to question the President in power when things like this occur, especially when it magically appears to benefit his party. People make the partisan correlation all the time, regardless...

You base it on the practice. Has it been even-handed treatment all around, or was it just conservative groups? Apparently it was conservative groups targeted, while in the same time period, liberal groups were treated differently. (I dropped the link somewhere in this thread, but I'm too lazy...

Isn't the question, were they even-handed in that policy? Evidence say's no and someone was fired or resigned or some such crap. You don't lose your job over policy to placate a whiner, you lose a job for doing something wrong.

:lol I'm not an object! BLLllllll

You're probably right. It seems the only people who want to go to nude beaches and get nude in public are the kind of people you don't want to see nude...

Expect plenty of accidents if this become the norm. :naughty

No. By anyone with a reasonable mind. There's nothing partisan about recognizing how badly someone has fucked up and causing greater suspicion by fabricating some lame story as an excuse.