Search results

She must need some attention. And money. I guess it's a plus that she's not pawning a 'hidden' sex tape.

Ugh. You win. No one uglier...

Of course it's strange to you; you've been arguing against the counterfeit and don't recognize the true faith as anything other than something you think is one mans delusion. I'm arguing past your revised Roman history to the true roots of Christianity. You probably know less about the...

If it were failing it wouldn't have endured to make it's way to me. I'll repeat: you don't even know what you're arguing against. Hipsters... this really is obscure to you. :lol

:lol Someone must have hit you with a shovel Jon.

It certainly does... Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. See that no man deceive you. :whistle

Used by whom and if the CC invented Christianity, what were the Jews doing with those 'gospels' any way? The idea that this is new is further proof of the CC's damage and just how confused atheists really are. You don't really know what you're arguing against.

At least 2008 - if not longer. :awkward

The Catholic Church didn't decide anything; Paul's epistles were used long before Romes decision to play let's make a deal with religion. If they had their way, and they did before the advent of the printing press, no one would have a bible but the 'pontiff'. Church history doesn't start in 312...

They were already around during Paul's ministry. He references false doctrine in his letters to the Galatians and chides them for falling for it. I'm sure as time passed it became easier to inject these things into churches, it's why Catholicism and other non-biblical forms have had such success.

Yes, let's all respect Rome, who after 300 years of killing Christians miraculously became 'Christian'. The fruits of that adoption are borne out wonderfully in the Catholic church. At least they didn't pretend in Pilate's day. (Angry homo's are poor sources for theological exegesis.) ;)

A rotten tooth.

:lol You people will believe anything to avoid believing the truth.

That's what I thought. The whole thing is a farce; a bunch of immoral goons indignant that an immoral goon is also immoral in private. Have his bribes dried up or something?

:lol

:lol Where ever did you get that idea? Ask Brendan Eich how that works.

I for one am shocked, that a publicly immoral douche bag would also be privately immoral. What's this world coming to when you can't even trust immoral douche bags to be moral when no one is looking? I definitely sympathize with Magic and Dogg on this one.

:lol

That sucks. I like a beer with dinner and some wine.