Search results

I definitely agree that the accounting is ambiguous. At the end of the day revenue is much short of expenses.

Well if there is a youtube video.... Seriously history states that 42 states ratified it when there was a requirement for only 36 so either 7 or more state legislatures were lying and continue to lie then okay but I put this up there with the 9-11 twofers.

You privatize it by giving it over to private firms. Giving it over to the individual is eliminating it. Medicare on a cost basis works better than private market. It's cheaper and as good or better on the health metrics. It's not funded properly and it's only available to a bunch of...

Spin baby spin. At least you are not guaranteeing a landslide like Dave.

I just think a source and context is important regardless. It's an ethic that I find important. Sue me. The context of a political hearing and the lack of noting the state departments response is biased quite simply. When it comes down to it the state department reps IMO looks bad as well...

You are going to have to demonstrate hwo I am stupid if you are going to have that bother me. Youre a GOP rah rah type and you feel that anyone that is not the same is your political enemy. I personally hate the two parties but you still see me as the enemy. Oh well.

That's better, princess, now let's put in all the context and not just the part you like.

Well for one thing it won't involve the current insurance establishment which is entrenched in the health care/payroll dynamic. That is what the ACA is all about: making sure the private insurer gravy train is rolling.

Not really.

I think Medicare violates equal protection and I didn't vote for Obama nor have I supported either party for a long time. But you want to not only eliminate SS but you want to 'give' the equity to private firms?

So is it that links for sources are hard to figure out how to list or is it that you are ashamed of your source and don't want to list it?

Oh how i have missed you, David. I watch Spurs and Cowboys games on the television. I watch movies on Netflix and torrent the rest. That's my visual media consultant. I listen to music from my Galaxy when I drive or turn it off. I read my news. Economist, National Review, New Republic...

Oh you and I are going to get along just great, puke.

I am voting the straight http://www.modernwhig.org/ ticket.

So David, are you willing to cut Medicare/Social security or any of the entitlements Boomers have voted themselves? Or do you actually want to be responsible and pay for your shit?

The economic legacy left by the baby-boomers is leading to a battle between the generations More worrying is that this generation seems to be able to leverage its size into favourable policy. Governments slashed tax rates in the 1980s to revitalise lagging economies, just as boomers approached...

Health Sector Employment Expected to Grow at Twice the Rate as General Economy by 2020, Adding 4.2 Million Jobs http://www.albany.edu/news/23475.php

Lol Breitbart columnists. Oh that's right you guys think Fox News is actually fair and balanced.

Well I think mindless partisans are no good for this country. So go ahead and get out your blue pompoms and call me a socialist.

Lovely now the communist thing. You want to help businesses? Quit the system that ties health care to payroll. It's a huge drag on business. There is a good way of doing that but none of you pukes wants to hear it.