Search results

ironic

Like what? Media whining? True, we need more good posters, but less drama queens.

well done, Dez

C'mon. That's not fair. We have at least eight people here.

At the Zone, if you notice anything amiss with the team, you're accused of "overreacting." Praising the patchwork o-line after one less than dominant game would also qualify.

You're still laboring under the impression that the line looked good last night. They didn't. If they put together a month or two of solid play, the "haters" will have to eat some crow, but that remains to be seen.

There's no reason to stop the so-called "hate." The line still looks dreadful. And not all realists think alike.

I don't think he truly believes that Jerry or the scouts are "vindicated" after one game. I think he just enjoys winding people up. :whistle

The "realist" point of view is that there's enough talent on this team to finish with a winning record despite mediocre players in the trenches. A winning team, but not a championship team. I saw nothing last night to change that. Even Jerry's fiercest critics didn't think we'd go 0-16.

Seriously. That's all we're asking for.

Dude, you're talking about a one-game sample. Would you propose to a girl after one date? Well, maybe you would, if you're lonely and horny enough. We won last night in spite of the line, not because of it. Half the time, Smith was being overpowered or spun like a top. The Romo pick happened...

The Zone was always worse after a win compared to a loss. That disease seems to be spreading.

True. Even Murray's long run was the result of a busted play. The fair thing to say is that the o-line "survived" this game. When Frenchy gets overpowered on the second play of the game, that has nothing to do with "reps."

Yep. And I remember Folk missing an easy FG.

This must be it. Bonus local news promo about misogynistic beavers.