Search results

I said I'd give this team more credit when they beat a better defense, and I'm holding to that after the Cincy game. But in all honesty, I think the Bengals had one of those games where they just didn't show up. It happens in this league. Unless people really think their defense is worse than...

That seems to be the consensus, that he actually improved quite a bit in 2015 from the year before, but the team overall was so much worse from that #1 (for a few weeks) season in 2014 that nobody saw him. I have to admit that I don't think I saw any of MSU last year, when I saw them play...

Dak is just pretty special in his leadership qualities, work ethic, charisma, etc. I don't think that was really a deficiency in Tony, he just didn't have that as much as Dak. But Dak's leadership was known from college. What nobody knew was that he could throw the ball this accurately or...

After this start, Jerry is probably already drawing up Red's extension contract as we speak.

I probably won't vote because 1) they both suck and neither are worthy of a vote, and 2) in this state my lesser-of-two-evils choice will win anyway. If either of those two things were different, I'd vote. I've voted my whole life. But never have I see two worse candidates than this.

Speaking of that, what happened to the vcash betting?

Do you mean what is the point of voting? Or what is my point? For me, there probably is no point in voting. I probably won't.

Oh, there's no doubt it's mostly to all Linehan anymore. Said it before, but all these bootlegs and misdirections would have been perfect for Tony, too, when he was younger. Parcells did it. But Garrett never did. But that's been true since 2014, I think. There's a reason Garrett never...

You can vote for him, but you're still going to have to live under the presidency of Trump or Hillary.

Still think it's about 95% Dak. The guy is a phenom. Those passes have incredible pinpoint accuracy. Combine that with his ability to move and it's a deadly combo. Funny how we're winning games without Romo, Dez, and Scandrick when the excuse crew last year said such a thing was absolutely...

Dammit I knew the Rangers' collapse meant I should change my pick

Problem with Hoof's analogy is unfortunately we can't avoid the result by sitting out. We're all going to have to take a bite of this shit sandwich whether we vote or not.

The thing is, Dodger, I don't know if they will learn the hard way. I'm not sure we couldn't be like a Spain with horribly high unemployment and a terrible economy and the mainstream media (I hate that term, but I guess it fits), the schools, etc will tell them it was someone else's fault...

God, please somehow stomp Bama next week...

Our media feels like Pravda now. That would've sounded ridiculous not too many years ago, but in 2016 it's really the truth. I guess they feel Trump gives them an excuse to end the charade and openly campaign for one candidate over another. It would be bad enough if this were a one-off...

I'm no Trump fan but I kind of agree about the comments. The truth is, we know that if you recorded all private comments from enough years ago, no man would be eligible to run. We've all made locker room type comments that were never meant for public consumption. Imagine the things a tape...

I know. He was a QB last year and he was so bad they moved him to safety. Then they moved him back to QB and a lot of reports said the coaches thought he was ahead of Dak. Then we realize he can't play QB and move him back to safety. What in the hell are we doing?

:lol

I dunno. Yesterday was like a Garrrett fourth quarter for nine innings. Actually it was mostly Hamels, who hasn't looked good his last several starts. The hope was maybe he wasn't 100% dialed in with the playoffs already sewn up, but now it looks like that was wishful thinking.

That's been the defense's fault most of the time, though. Not his.