Search results

Both DE's are lined up over the Tackles. lol

So please explain how Ware is going against the OT in this particular defense. Or do you think a 4-3 DE plays behind the DT in a 4-3?

So you do realize you showed a picture of a package defense and not a true 3/4. There might be hope for you yet.

You showed a picture of a 3-4 with only 1 ILB and think that proves a point, anybody with sense would realize that is not a base set. Or do you think we run a 3-3 defense.?

Ware has never played DE and is closer to 6'5 and would need to add some weight and use different technique and Oh yeah none of those guys has outperformed Ware as a OLB, so tell me again why we won't to have Ware change positions? But anyway I am done, you can continue to believe the only...

This is not true I don't know what you have been watching. I never said Ware could not play DE I said I don't want my best player switching positions and having to fight a OT on most running downs, there is a reason he plays the WOLB in our defense its because they want him to play in space...

WTF? What does that have to do with anything I said. Do you think that Williams had the same responsibilities in both defenses? You never answered the question about where the DE in a 3/4 lines up or do you think they both line up over the OT?

That's impossible Parcells was in charge.:awkward

No he does not, Who does the DE line up over in a 3/4 defense or do you think they both line up over the OT? If Ware lined up the same place as the DE in a 4-3 then why are we even talking about switching so he can just put his hand on the ground? :Dunce

It sure worked out for the Giants this year and Green Bay last year both had patchwork lines, its something that a good coach can work around. I want a upgrade on the inside but there is no need to be freaking out about using big money, the offense is not the reason we missed out on the playoffs.

Thats totally false who is lining up over the OT in a a 3/4 defense. What would Ware's responsibility be on run downs as a DE in a 4-3? If its not that much difference then why even change?

No he is not, that's a myth that some continue to hold on too. And frankly it shows some really have no idea of what the 2 positions are required to do and its really simple if you just look at who those guys line up over.

I don't believe that asking your best player to switch positions and add punishment to fis body at this point in his carrer is wise move. Yes Ware could be effective as a De but there is guarantee he will be a All Pro as a DE and its certainly no guarantee the defense gets better so why take...

lol Yeah he abused that.

You can get Coleman and Spears off the field in other ways we still have the draft and money left over in FA. You can also stop Spencer and Ware from playing in coverage by the LB's you have brought in, I think Conner and Carter will both take over some of Spencer's coverage responsibilities...

We already have flexibility to use the 4-3 we ran some of it last year. I don't understand why so many think a switch would be such a huge difference we run a lot of 4 man lines in nickel situations already.

I'll pass the market has gotten to rich for midlevel receivers, I would do what we did last year and draft a guy and let the yougins battle it out. If that does not work pick up a guy after the last cuts.

Did he really say he would rather have Robinson over Carr? Way to lose any credibility.:Dunce

Never looked at it like that but it could very well work out that way. The market could be pretty good if something like last year happens again.

Whether it actually stays here does matter because we could get outbid for are own oil. Anybody with half a brain would realize that.