Search results

Yep, that was a critical portion of that game, and he's obviously looking at the field as he's talking.

I'm glad dbair is acknowledging the league is out to get the Vikes

You know, we joked about it at the time, but I never thought it could actually happen... What if this really was reaching the sidelines?

Actually I suspect that's exactly what happens. I doubt Tony goes in with the second string for any mop up duty.

Gosselin said the other day that 1) Tony may not want to play, and 2) the team may not want to play him because if he got hurt it would kill his trade value. Could happen.

Who do we rest? We couldn't be more healthy. I bet we're the healthiest team in the league.

Well not LA good, but yeah, too good to move.

Giants won't get this done with four yard passes.

League obvs wants the Cowboys in the Superbowl

At least they get a true throwback to their glory days though and not some clown suit like most teams.

Sweet Parcells-era throwbacks. What happened to having to wear the same helmets, though?

I wonder how many of those political reporters even knew what the wishbone was.

The difference is, I don't remember Jimmy and his adoring press corps claiming he was targeting Emmitt all along like Garrett and some of his media fans are doing with the O-line. At least Jerry has been very honest in admitting how lucky we got with Dak.

Someone called into Norm's show today and asked what if Cousins gets away from the Skins and Tony went there...

Zeke "Butthead" Elliott

They play classic bend-don't-break defense, but that's a terrible match for us because we have the power run game to convert to TDs when we get in the red zone, which most teams don't. Yep, the defense has played great lately, they really have. This is what good coaching looks like, thanks to...

I do understand the point. Just because Jimmy did it once and Emmitt didn't get hurt, that doesn't make it the right decision. Sometimes people make bad decisions that turn out to be right. A favorable outcome doesn't indicate a proper decision.

No, I don't. If you want to suit him up and play him a few plays to keep him in some kind of weekly rhythm, that's one thing. If he's in there chasing a record late in a meaningless game, that's idiocy. Doesn't matter what the results turn out to be.

Yes, and CMD has said repeatedly that Houck was the one responsible. I heard it years ago from some radio guys who knew Houck well (from the 90s) who said the same thing.

No but this is Garrett we're talking about