Search results

Absolutely spot on Sheik. There was a time when immigrants had to be "sponsored" to come here. That was the case with my family. When they became US citizens they then sponsored others. They brought over family members, gave them jobs, housing, etc. and these folks ended up being business...

Or folks want you to put your money on Hillary. Personally, I can't see her not getting indicted. Things will change from now until election day.

Batman vs Superman. What an absolute mess. A horribly bad movie with no plot, no pacing, no character development. It just seemed like these people just put together this piece of shit movie, lived off the name(s), took people's money and couldn't give two shits.

Those interviews are what they are but I'm not sure he set the trap himself. I don't think anyone who supported Trump is going to change their minds because of the interview and visa versa.

Did you watch it without any volume Dooms?

From the first few seconds, the question is "If you say that abortion is a crime or if abortion is murder, you have to deal with it under the law......should abortion be punished?" Even the interviewer talks about a "matter of law if you ban abortion."

Don't let them sway you David. That's exactly how it was posed. It was a loaded question. I mean, if abortion was illegal I'd assume it's because the fetus was defined as life. So if a woman got one and terminated that life, how could she not get punished? What's the point of having the law...

I think it could very well happen. Trump doesn't like to "lose." The establishment made him sign an agreement where he'd support the Republican nominee and now we see the establishment will not support him if he reaches the delegate count. I have to admit, I was caught completely off-guard by...

I completely agree. All these folks live segregated from the average folks and have no fucking clue. They don't live in reality. They'll demand we compromise and live a certain way which they would never accept for their own family or children. They're fucking hypocrites.

Young folks today have lived off their parents who have given them most everything they've needed to sustain themselves. This is all they know for the most part and they want the government to take their parents' place and provide for them as they get older. They have no ambition and blame...

The Republican establishment are pretty much ensuring that they won't win the election. And I don't even think they give a shit because they'll still maintain their power structure. Say what you want about Trump, but he's exposed the "process" and the political parties for they are. Corrupt...

I was a huge fan but the guy has gone off the cliff to the left and infused politics into his shows. I do think it's funny though that he talks about "high times on Wall Street, hard times on Main Street" while he charges $300 plus for a nosebleed ticket. These people are hypocrites.

Springsteen just canceled his concert in Greensboro to protest the law. Insane. I'll bet you BB is on his way to NC now just to use every lady's room he comes across.

Your assumptions about you being the end all authority because you do this for a living is arrogant. The facts of the case can be Googled. That's obvious. The transcripts can be Googled. The videos of the interviews can be Googled. Just about most anything related to this case can be...

Superpunk invited me to DCU and turned me on to this place. I'd vote to bring him back but I'm loyal like that. Jon was just a lost soul that needed some direction from you guys and you basically threw him to the curb. I'd rather Jon take his frustrations out on a message board than a bus...

Man have we lost our mind as a country. And the silent majority just sits back and takes another hit.

You have no idea what I do you arrogant fuck and just by your answers I question the very fact if if you've ever dealt with a criminal case or saw the inside of a criminal court room beyond a field trip. Stick with divorces, estate planning, wills and trusts.

I was mistaken on one thing. I assumed that I was communicating with someone who had a basic understanding of criminal law. I won't make that mistake again.

There were some assertion of facts that, no matter how you want to spin it, are facts. Where one stands on the idea of a conspiracy or coverup is an opinion. I would think that would obviousness as folks raise question that point them in one direction or the other and form their belief The...

Listen, there was no misunderstanding. A disagreement, obviously. We're obviously on polar opposites of certain issues which, quite frankly, you should know better. If you don't like how I presented an opinion on an open forum, I could care less.