Search results

Nicks Dez Maclin/Austin Jackson Maclin and Austin are a wash imo. One is just as good as the other.

lol Always good for a laugh..

He's the best on the team. I'd go to the Giants if i wanted to talk best in the division.

Again, you don't seem to realize it has nothing to do with the Cowboys. Im not nominating a Cowboy for best WR in the division, im saying D Jag isn't even the best on his team. He was outproduced by the guy who is a better overall WR than him. Im not the only one who, if i was starting a team...

..and if i was being a homer, i'd nominate a Cowboys for best WR in the division. I've stated repeatedly that i'd take Maclin all day over D Jag. He's simply a better all around WR. Nothing homerish about it.

Imaginary polls arn't included in the definition of the word "facts".

I agree if he got more carries his YPT would have gone down. How much? I dunno.. im all for giving him a chance to find out though. I think he's earned it and if we don't find out now we are doing ourselves a disservice. He's only 24, we spent a first round pick on him, he had a very solid year...

BTW.. NFL writers are not the be all end all of football knowledge. Just ask JJT or Jen Engle or Timmy Mac.. alot of stupidity has come out of the Dallas beat writers in the past for sure.

You make alot of statements to back up your points that are simply untrue. If you really think you're right though, why don't you go poll a forum of every team in the division. 47 catches and 1000 yards and 6 TD's doesn't get you best WR in the NFC East. Doesn't even get you best WR on the...

Yup, and i don't have a problem with saying that. As i said, if you want to increase the minimum number of touches if you don't think 200 is enough, i understand that. That's a fair point to make. However, saying that rushing yards should matter more than receiving yards or vice versa is just...

And boom goes the dynamite.

..as they should be. Its f u c k i n g football. Christ, why don't we just put the flags on them already.

Pull it back white guys.. pull it back.

You realize im being sarcastic right now? lol

First of all, Bradshaw missed out because, contrary to your belief, all RB's receiving stat's arn't automatically significantly higher. Bradshaw averaged 4.5 a carry, but only 6.7 yards per reception, unlike alot of the other elite backs who averaged around 9 or 10 per reception. Jackson and...

No, i've been told by reliable sources on this board that he's the next big thing, the 10th wonder of the world you could say.

I bet most of the men you've been with have said that to you as well..

No! Not "The Great" DeSean Jackson! No! NOOOO!

So how many yards they get every time when they carry the ball is more important than how many yards they gain for you every single time they touch the football? So we're penalizing for being a good receiving threat out of the backfield now huh? Flawless logic.. how you arn't in the NFL...

This week, John Beck said he was glad McNabb didn't appear to have a future with the Redskins and he sees himself as the team's quarterback. Oh, and this part was hilarious btw.. considering Beck won't ever be good enough to even sniff McNabb's jock. Its not wonder McNabb doesn't respond to...