Search results

Man have we lost our mind as a country. And the silent majority just sits back and takes another hit.

You have no idea what I do you arrogant fuck and just by your answers I question the very fact if if you've ever dealt with a criminal case or saw the inside of a criminal court room beyond a field trip. Stick with divorces, estate planning, wills and trusts.

I was mistaken on one thing. I assumed that I was communicating with someone who had a basic understanding of criminal law. I won't make that mistake again.

There were some assertion of facts that, no matter how you want to spin it, are facts. Where one stands on the idea of a conspiracy or coverup is an opinion. I would think that would obviousness as folks raise question that point them in one direction or the other and form their belief The...

Listen, there was no misunderstanding. A disagreement, obviously. We're obviously on polar opposites of certain issues which, quite frankly, you should know better. If you don't like how I presented an opinion on an open forum, I could care less.

Or Avery himself could have wiped the keys and the only DNA left on it was his. And a bullet with the victim's blood DNA was found in Avery's garage. Where did that come from? So if the police wiped the victim's DNA off the keys and planted it in Avery's house, we'd have to assume that they...

I figured from your post(s) that you appreciated a certain decorum when going back and forth. Of course I think my opinion is right. Otherwise, why would I post it? Does everyone that posts an opinion here at DCU have to qualify it with "I believe" or "in my opinion?" I figured that was...

No murder case is perfect and not every question could be answered. The only people that know exactly what happened and how it happened are the murderers themselves, which I believe is Avery and Dassey. I get the crime scene question. It's a point worthy of discussion. But what's so earth...

So now I don't have some kind of trump card. That's good to know. I've brought up multiple reasons, from the jury decision, to the evidence, to the conspiracy theory which I don't necessarily buy for various reasons, to the slanted "documentary" and lord knows what else. If you can't follow...

I didn't gloss over your statement. The fact that some folks had a "doubt" until they reviewed the evidence and deliberated with the other jurors is not uncommon. If it was, it wouldn't take days or weeks for a jury to come to a decision. And the rest of your point is sheer speculation. They...

There is an absolute at trial. He was found guilty by a jury. That's the only absolute that counts. If that doesn't count for you, no sweat. I tend to think the folks who heard the evidence presented by both sides eventually decided on guilt. That has to account for something beyond a bunch...

What do jury deliberations have anything to do with what we're discussing? He was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Juries can deliberate for hours, days or weeks. At the end of the day, Avery was found guilt and the evidence against him met that standard. I don't have to know what...

The only surprising thing for me would be if a political figure is involved and questions arise as to the source of the money. I mean, was Putnin a successful bisiness man prior becoming a politician? This would have had to have happened after he left/retired from the KGB. If it's legal...

What's the difference if I base my opion on one source (or multiple) print media sources and you base it off a TV program? Is your source better than mine in terms of information? Or did you base your opinion on something else, like maybe you were there? If that's the case, I'll gladly defer...

Of course. The eye witnesses misidentified him. Folks had two choices. Either not proceed with the first trial and disregard the victim or go forward with the victim's testimony. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. He was eventually exhonorated based on DNA and DNA evidence put him back...

It is at this point. He'll need to bring up new evidence to get a new trial. You act as if he wasn't found guilty.

I'm sorry, I didn't know he was found not guilty. I must have missed that.

Two things. First, I've read up on it and there are opposing views on-line. I haven't really posted many opinions here but I do have them. One thing I won't do is jump to Avery's defense until someone gives me more than multiple police departments and District Attorney's Offices planted...

There wasn't any reasonable doubt at the trial and he was found guilty. The show was slanted to make him look like a patsy.

The cops, even in the civil suit, were covered by the PD/County/State. They wouldn't pay damages out of pocket.