Search results

THAT WAS A FUCKING HORSECOLLAR. And Phil Simms... shut the fuck up! You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. So you're saying because Romo was OUT OF THE POCKET is why it wasn't a horsecollar? If it was done to Manning, it would've been called.

THAT WAS A FUCKING HORSECOLLAR. And Phil Simms... shut the fuck up! You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. So you're saying because Romo was OUT OF THE POCKET is why it wasn't a horsecollar? If it was done to Manning, it would've been called.

Speechless.

GOOD CHALLENGE GARRETT. Surprised, because Manning would have usually gotten the ball off quicker than that.

Well what the fuck are we supposed to do?

If that is what's going to take for him to produce after all this time, then he needs to go.

Same here. I love Seattle. I like the way Detroit is constructing their team. In 5 years they used three 1st round draft picks on DL: Suh, Fairly, and Ansah --- who is on his way to becoming DROY. And it's paying dividends. You have an excellent DL like that, and you don't need to waste an...

T.O. at that time was our best offensive weapon. Dez is now our best offensive weapon. And yet like T.O., we cannot seem to consistently get Dez the ball. And Garrett has been the constant in both situations.

Benched who?

Not only with the last name, but he shares quite a bit with Roy Williams.

That, and on TEs and CBs.

It's not just that they impose their will, but rather they just simply use common sense.

SUCH THE FUCK UP MAN! Your team won. Period.

A good player on a very bad team. They picked him way too early. He would have been there at their pick in the 2nd round.

He played well in the last game though.

It's not often, but I will give credit to the Redskins. You had the good sense to get rid of Zorn just after a couple of years. Garrett = Zorn without as talented a team. Hell, Garrett = Campo without as talented a team.

As great a DC LeBeau was, he was as lousy an HC.

Great write-up. Very Omega Supreme-esque.

LOL. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Are we a .500 team because we have the .500 coach? Personally, I think a .500 coach would be able to make this team better than .500. I say we are an above .500 team with a below .500 coach, and thus we are .500 in entirety because of it.