Search results

They are not posting things that the president never said. He was obviously not talking about Benghazi and as I linked you within 14 hours of the attack he was on CBS stating that he did not believe that the Benghazi attacks were simply film protests but they were clearly targeting Americans...

I agree that Carter's response to the OPEC cartel was poor. He fucked that up royally. OTOH, the Camp David Accord is probably the single greatest foreign policy success since WW2. Other's may point to Nixon normalizing relations with China but i see that as buying friends. Getting the...

Can you point to me the part where he says that the Libya attacks were not because of terrorists. He said 'over the last two weeks.' It's like you read the headline and then shut your brain off. Were there or were there not violent protests across the Middle East. Are you saying that the...

You keep parroting the Fox narrative like a good minion but yet: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57538689/emails-detail-unfolding-benghazi-attack-on-sept-11/ The video is at the link. Fox does a very poor job of informing you but a great job at programming the narrative.

Such insight..... :jerkoff How about you tell us more about how he will tun this country into a communist state.

So you think that it's objective to take another carriers anonymous source and run with it despite a denial straight from the accused? The Fox anonymous source said that CIA agents were in the area and were told to stand down. The CIA said that never happened. I realize that you want everyone...

Yeah i read this on the way out the door this afternoon and laughed my ass off. Romney's handlers must've been pissed.

Mourdock and the emails came out the same day and they were the top two headlines everywhere. The Mourdock story had legs because he said it and then the next day made a point to not apologize for it and considering the GOP ostracized Akin for about the same comments less than a month ago it...

Just because you don't want your sources examined doesn't mean that their sources should just be ignored. What do you think about Russian, Italian, or Iranian state news? You think they are credible? Roger Ailes was a GOP media adviser for GOP bigwigs including Reagan all the way up until...

They don't ignore it. Go to their websites and its easy to see where the stories are. The recent Fox anonymous source was carried by all the major carriers. It's things like this that make me question your claims of viewing these other sources because all i hear is the typical Fox refrain of...

Credibility of source is not a fallacy.

No, my roommate watches Fox so i get a nice dose of the narrative. It has nothing to do with the what you don't agree with and everything to do with what i am reading from your posts. As for the last, that hilarious. are you familiar with Roger Ailes history? lol not totally

You have been watching it? Where do you think the narrative of 'coverup' and 'impeachment' is coming from? I see what you are trying to do but my point is valid. You spew the Fox narrative to a T. Your offhand dismissal does not just make it go away.

I find all cable news to be reprehensible. It's like getting your music taste from Billboard. I say what i say because you parrot a narrative and it's obvious. You eat the programming and I have to ask how much MSNBC for example have you watched in the last month?

As soon as I saw that the source was a blog, I could guess what was coming. They are used to getting their news from a GOP strategist so this is old hat for them.

Without honor as well. Deceit is normally frowned upon in your dogma no?

Try Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, the Economist, and the Christian Science Monitor. I don't watch much TV much less TV news but if I do I watch CBS and only then because I knew the man that ran the Middle East Bureau a decade ago. I don't fit into your box of a worldview, pumpkin. I reject...

Sheik a conservative pollster saying that there is some absolute proportion of 'likely voters' being GOP is fun and all but that is a far cry from making the claim that likely voter demographics are not taken into consideration. The use of the word 'may' should be noted.

That is quite ironic VA. I am more than willing to analyze what I believe to be true especially when it is questioned. I do not fear the truth. First think I did when looking at your post was to look for information to get down to the bottom of this. The only one clinging to anything is...

Highly unlikely based on what? I have read a couple of reports stating that the demographics are markedly the same.