Search results

i'd agree with this 100%. this fictional "it hurts the poor" is bullshit. we can find ways around that if it will help people in different situations. but then again, we are talking to "bad-whitey" here in sp so everything gets twisted around to suit the corkscrew way he sees things.

damn skippy. what i find "funny" is people think that if it looks like what the military uses, it's an assault rifle. tactical is a good way to put it but that word is also overused "in the industry". but it does fit this gun. while it's base function is no more dangerous than a browning .308...

yep. it does. but they make a lot of .22's that look like this, even break down like them so you can use them for target practice w/cheaper ammo. those also come in .308 i believe. i hear people say you don't hunt with guns like that so why own one, then i watch yukon men on tv and quite a few...

well 1st, to "own" a fully automatic weapon, you have to go through the government in a very painful process. automatic is you keep your finger on the trigger, it keeps firing. *these* guns are heavily scrutinized and the people who own them have to go through hell and back to have the permit...

why is he a coward because he doesn't believe in guns or guns in the hands of children? i can be adult and disagree with him w/o having to get that personal.

that was NOT an assault rifle. the definition of "assault weapon" seems to change as the liberal media needs it to. at it's core, it was a fully automatic weapon. period. the military seldom even uses fully auto weapons anymore and their guns shoot 3 round bursts. as for what happened in...

sorry. you said to do away with what got us this far. i was looking for alternatives, or at least reasons behind such a statement.

i just can't get excited about JJT. he's a tool in the worst way who feeds off social journalism.

granted. but i won't make every move they make or don't make support a pessimistic view. ed reed, if he got anywhere near $6mil a year simply wouldn't be worth it to the cowboys. not now. he'd not put us over the top, he'd not get us into the playoffs and he'd not be here in 2 years. so...

when the bible and vikings came out, people said it smoked walking dead in it's initial numbers. i watched "the bible" and am done. vikings, and i consider myself a viking in some part of a previous life, i don't get. the storytelling so far is off and the reaches you're asked to make to make...

i have fears people always believe the PR department. if we're looking to add huff, or another safety in FA then cool. but we simply can't do it until romo and spencer are signed to better deals. sucks. totally. but i'm not 100% unhappy we didn't sign a 34 year old player to mentor players...

like you, i'm stunned it passed 31-1. i'm stunned it passed at all but for a league of vaunted "football guys" everyone but cincy failed in this.

you should really stop shooting your penis.

so then what? we complain a system that has founded this nation and built it to where it is today is suddenly the problem? maybe *we the people* are cause we bicker over things that don't matter. maybe we've always done that. the point isn't and should never be what side to take. the point...

the ravens are going to have a hard time filling leadership voids.

there are plenty of people who are not total pricksheads. you just don't happen to be one of them.

and this is who we elected: "What I was suggesting — you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith..." — Obama on ABC's This Week. Two months before the election, Obama discussed with George Stephanopoulos the false rumors that he is a Muslim and addressed the...

LOL

i'm somehow reminded of obama saying people need to pay their fair share of taxes and the "rich" should hush up and pay. when was this? oh yea, when he first won the election. then, almost every single one of his appointees hadn't paid taxes in years. DOH! but yea, let's just pretend one side...

odd. so was obama. maybe they worked together to promote peace.