Search results

Way to go Garrett. Getting Romo hurt like that.

Yeah it is. Then a game like this past Monday goes to remind you. I started to believe. That's why I'm so pissed about the loss. It was quite recent that I would have rejoice in a loss like that, because it would mean one step out the door for Garrett. But as we were winning these past weeks...

If Garrett would have fucking stuck with the run game and not get cute, and did simple things to neutralize these blitzes... Romo would not be hurt.

Two 1st round draft picks for Joey Galloway. A 1st rounder, 3rd rounder, and a late round pick for Roy Williams. Trading up for Morris Claiborne. And yet this asshole would have all of us believe that he was the architect behind the Herschel Walker trade?

Yeah. If something is working too well, then obviously opposing teams have it figured out and made adjustments to it... so let's beat them to the punch and not feature it, while failing to understanding that is just one less thing the opposing team has to worry about. Murray, Witten, Dez...

Garrett is always gong to be pass first. In fact I believe that deep down side him, he'd rater lose b passing than win by running. Everybody always think we just dump on Garrett and credit him with nothing good, and blame him for all the bad. Fact is, we know when Garrett's fingerprints are all...

Then why play the rest of the game? Why not just end the game right there? We are a good enough team, and the Redskins are a lousy enough team to where we could have and should have overcome that fumble. We overcame a blocked punt that was ran in for a TD; and then a muffed punt courtesy of...

THANK YOU! With all the miscues we had, we still had a chance to win it either in regulation or OT. Players' mistakes can be overcome throughout the course f the game; coaching... not so much.

Despite that fumble, we still had opportunities to win, and Garrett fucked them up.

Yes and no. That fumble hurt. But you give him a chance to redeem himself, and Garrett balked on that.

Actually it is that quite simple. There is a reason why the majority of teams do not max blitz consistently or with as much frequency as last night. Because they would get killed by it. Haslett doesn't even run max blitz with any other team, except the Cowboys. We ran a WR screen with Williams...

Not punching the ball in on the goal line was asinine. You do it, and we don't have overtime. But for an encore... in OT, Murray reels off 8 yards on 1st down, making it 2nd and 2. But what do we do...? WE PASS --- TWICE!!!

Thank you. I knew all of this especially the screens. But why the fuck Garrett doesn't get this? Don't understand why no screens to Dunbar. That one WR screen to Williams worked, why not continue it?

Word is that Murray was pissed in the locker room that he threw his helmet.

Murray finished with 143 yards. No they weren't stopping it. Garrett stopped it. Stopped it on the goal line. Stopped it on 2nd and 2 after Murray ripped off 8 on first down.

5 YEARS AND COUNTING. Haslett has doing it. Got to the point yesterday that Haslett was blitzing on every down late in the game.

LOL. Yeah once that shit is in you... you're in. Feel like a battered wife: can't walk away.

Shame that we will never get to see what Romo could and would achieve if he had a real coach.

The most maddening thing is that Garrett is a former QB, and you wold tink that he would consider that if he was the QB, how he would beat the blitz? When does common sense makes its presence known?

Not using Murray to punch it in on the goal line but opting to pass cost us moreso. Not calling Murray's number on 2nd and 2, and thereby sustain the drive cost us as much.