Search results

Christine Michael may play Sunday, per report, fantasy dorks rejoice Christine Michael's role with his new team keeps increasing and he may make his Dallas Cowboys debut on Sunday. We break down the fantasy implications. Dallas Cowboys running back Christine Michael has long been a favorite...

He won't need to be.

Of course not. I put most of this loss on the coaching, namely Garrett.

So those three and outs in the second half, and the failure to get the run game going was all the defense's fault? And even part of the first with the INT... that was the defense's fault? The failure to make offensive adjustments to counteract the defensive adjustments by Atlanta... that was...

True. This team does play down to the level of competition, but where they would have lost possibly to said scrubs, they would have beaten a full strength Atlanta team. Peculiar how that works. Beat the best that a team has to offer, while losing to the worse that a team has to offer.

After further thought, I think we may see Michael in action against the Saints. Think about it. After the bye week, the Cowboys have to make roster cuts to make room for McClain and Hardy, and they have to deactivate a couple of players for the same reason. So this would be the best opportunity...

If you're not going to trust the QB to throw downfield, when the defense presents it... then why bother? Seems that Garrett has serious trust issues with the players, when it's the players that should have trust issues with Garrett --- hw many other HCs ice their own kickers? The players have...

I would feel a bit better about their chances if Michael ends up starting, and Mincey being back --- he was missed. Ryan is playing better than Brees right now, and the Saint do not have a stud WR like Jones. However, this team under Garrett, does has a propensity of turning no-name WRs into...

Not getting my hopes up. Heres my issue... you bring these new guys in, then for God sakes use them.

Saints. They will get their first win against us. It always sets up that way.

They weren't against the Giants.

Ok I get it because Quinn was the DC for Seattle, but then assphuck how d you explain the first half where the Cowboys gouged the Falcons' defense, especially with the run? Did they commit a lot of people to the LOS then, and were their corners playing high then? Then how do you explain last...

How did he not get called hands to the face on that one pay?

And yet he remains unemployed with all the other 31 teams.

We have too many players like this that are starting and not due to injury: Hayden, Hitchens, Wilbur, Church, Wilcox, Randal, and McFadden.

If we had both Romo and Dez, we would have beaten Atlanta without a doubt. Anyone who says otherwise is full of shit. Because all you would have had to ask them is, whether the Falcons would have won without Ryan and Jones. The Falcons would not have beaten the Eagles or Giants without Jones...

Sounds like the makings of a Buddy Ryan - Gilchrist feud. Where Ryan socked Gilchrist, who ran the Run-N-Shoot offense, that led to a lot of 3 and outs and bad field position for the defense to contend with.

Also vintage Garrett is the sacrificial lamb. Not sure why this guy was singled out, but nobody played well on defense.

3 and outs take a toll on the defense.

No doubt. Something we can take solace in. Romo of course would have gotten Dez the ball, but also the other WRs. Definitely would be running away with this division.