Search results

And then watch him turn around and have a career game against us. Always seem to happen like that.

We held him to 40 yards the first time around and he was healthy. But it is New York, and I can see him doing a Willis Reed-type performance.

That Unga Unga guy that plays LB, has problems with his neck and was held out of practice yesterday.

Odell Beckham has missed two days of practice for hamstring issues. And Ruben Randal has been a limited participant. If Beckham doesn't play... there would be no excuse if we do not win. None whatsoever. Hardy missed practice due to an illness.

Giants are without Amukamara, and that's huge. But... we got Garrett... so that kind of negates the loss of Amukamara.

Giants never play that bad against us, the way they played the Eagles.

As of the time of this posting... the Redskins are ranked #17 in rushing. Yep. Making a difference.

That's his reputation...? How so? Sounds like a legend in his own mind. A number of players --- Ray Lewis being the most prominent publicly stated that the Cowboys' offensive system was the easiest and most predictable in the league.

It's been our biggest problem since Garrett came here, and Sparano left.

But then there is fucking Garrett. Pass rush becomes ineffective when the offense is constantly going 3 and out.

But for those two issues I named... Eli's flub wouldn't have made a difference is what I am saying. It cuts both ways.

If if if. That old chestnut again. Well IF Beasely doesn't fumble, or Witten have that fluke INT --- seems to always have them against the Giants; they Cowboys would have won by a greater margin. Take a look at the box score, we dominated them in total yards and nearly every other category.

You really believe that shit? Seriously? I get it. Maybe you're trying to play devil's advocate, but seriously.

Both those teams are crap. If Romo and Dez... we'd run away with this division.

You mean that one that caused Romo to break his collarbone?

Part of me thinks that Jerry wouldn't depart from a winning formula. But... he extended Garrett, and I'm of the opinion that Garrett felt he had leverage, and might have made as a condition for his extension that he goes back to the way he had it (8-8).

If people didn't harp on it too much, they probably would have went after an RB. But they seem intent on defying common sense and what they perceived as the public and media trying to dictate their draft strategy. It wouldn't surprise me to find that they may have altered their draft strategy...

There has been a steady constant decline in their rushing game. And while you and the other claim that the numbers show an improvement over last year at about this time, it seems that the first two games were outliers. So does Callahan get the blame for that?

Are you including QB rushing attempts in those totals? Because you can have a QB that gets flushed out of the pocket, and runs for yards, and it will add to it. PERSPECTIVE. Try it. BTW... how did the Redskins do on the ground today? I'll wait.

If they make the playoffs... they'll be dangerous as usual.