Search results

It looks like a tactical .223.

Yeah, because giving a literacy test is the same as requiring someone to show who they are. Brilliant point.

Yet there is very clear evidence of welfare fraud. Which is very important information when it comes to who constituents are voting for. Can't blame them. They don't want their free paycheck taken away, but just like drug tests for welfare recipients, there should be checks and balances.

Then provide an option to give them an ID card for free. Just can't be on welfare. I don't feel people on welfare should be able to vote to begin with. Why should someone sucking the system's tit get to decide which tit it gets to suck?

Which is more proof that our courts and judges are ridiculously slanted at times.

That shit is racist to white people.

SP gets raped in a thread... again.

That's a direct response to your white guilt. Dumb shit.

Hunting is like dog fighting and only the white man does anything wrong. That's some pretty badass street cred you got thar.

So are the Black Panthers and the Mexican Mafia. But, they're cool, so nothing to see here.

Well, that's apparently not true or we would have been more active in FA so far. This has been one of the best FA classes in recent memory, and because we have no money had to sit back on our laurels while watching other teams make quality signings.

Correct, and there still are a few of them that are FAs, and we have to sit back with our thumbs in our ass because all of our money is tied up in a one year wonder.

Well, if we're going to sign him long term let's giterdone. Maybe we can still sign an OL in FA with the cap savings. Wait too long and there won't be any quality FAs left.

I agree, and as an extension of that all the changes that Goodell has made to the draft and the Pro Bowl. Changes that honestly were absolutely not needed nor warranted.

Showoff.

You mean like that pork filled empathy relief crap that passed for Hurricane Sandy? Got support from lots of people that didn't have shit to do with the actual hurricane.

Okay, we are well off the original path of this discussion. You are advocating that some govt regulation to a civil union must stay in place for property rights, and I'm saying that you don't have to change tax status' because of that union thereby eliminating that factor from the equation of...

You're talking about ifs as if they were inevitable. They can own a home, they just have no way to divvy shit up in case they separate. Same with your next post about wills. They can leave shit to each other but you're arguing as if they won't write a will, in which case it's their own damn...

It wouldn't be an easy transition, but getting the govt out of the way is the answer, not the solution.