Search results

I don't know that what you posted is in contrast to what I did. The percentages didn't even match to what it is supposed to be disputing. So the Dept. of Labor is the endall to this? And a report from the director of the Dept. of Social Services isn't reliable? I guess the fact that welfare...

I would't be overjoyed. The first two are ok. The 3rd rounder is a big fat FEH.

Doesn't prove a thing. First, your snippet says something about 24%. Where does it say in the one I posted anything about 24%? Is it even an article in direct contention to the one I posted? Second, if you want to believe there isn't a problem with welfare fraud, be my guest. Continue...

This article must have been right under the everyone deserves it one you found. This one is from the L.A. Times. Your having no speakers at work shouldn't hinder you on this one, I'd hope. Welfare Fraud Study Your April 26 article on the recent study examining welfare fraud in Orange County...

I can only assume someone has hacked your account. The proper response from you would have been the tried and true "No u".

Ah, can't come up with anything, resort to childish insults. Well played. Also, I'm at work, too. Don't hate me because I have a better job than you.

lol Not surprised in the least this is your angle. I showed you some proof. The 2nd vid is especially damning, as it shows widespread abuse. The first is just a single example. You're a smart guy, I'm sure you know how to use google.

And here's a video specifically for your assumption that if they apply, they deserve. Which only lends credence to Iamtdg's statement about fixing the entire program. http://youtu.be/tqLrvwplCiY

http://youtu.be/NVqsQq9XcHE Go to google. Or to youtube. There are endless examples. Also, using your own eyes and common sense could prove helpful. And this example doesn't even touch on the people that pump out kids at sickening rates so their monthly check increases.

lol Yeah. It's called common sense and my own eyes. Play your games with somebody else. Not interested.

Such a broad statement. So, since you've already thrown out the 2% number I'd assume that's your tiny percent. And that number was used by you as the drug users. So the other 98% percent of them are just hard working people down on their luck, eh? Iamtdg is talking about a whole system...

I have no idea.

lol Nice. I bet that really frosted ol' Hos' nuts. He damn near had an conniption fit a few years ago when some dude said he bought the rights to Bob Hayes' gravesite. Or some shit like that.

lol Winner.

:lol I was wondering what the redhead connection was. Now it makes sense.

Those 4 words should NEVER be put together in the same sentence.

Did you just have a stroke? Should we be alarmed? Call for help? Can I have your admin position if you die? :awkward

Made up. Par for the course. Along with all your other hyperbolic bullshit in this and other topics like it. And you accused Midswat of thinking with HIS heart and not his head. lol

Awesome. You posted numbers that that show it will cost more money. Except we all already knew that. I never said the state would save money with this program. I was only questioning your bullshit 200 a month number.

A quick google search showed this. So, a single mother with 1 (one, ONE!) kid will get a total of 710.00 per month in gov't assistance. (really. Now how many career welfare mommas have only 1 kid) Two parents and three kids would bring in 1460.00 Now, I'm not a math guy, but that looks to be...