Search results

  1. junk

    Who you got? Week 10

    Eh, this game is one that Dallas would typically spit the bit on. However, I don't see how they could. If their depth chart on their website is to be believed, Alan Ball is a starting CB for the Jags. I guess if they have a horrible game plan (possible) and Romo is hurt/ineffective...
  2. junk

    Who you got? Week 10

    Dallas
  3. junk

    NFL Week #9: TNF | Arizona Cardinals (6-1) @ Dallas Cowboys (6-2)

    I feel like we've been through this before. Not unless you franchise him
  4. junk

    Must see movies....

    I'm writing a horror story called The Cabal
  5. junk

    Romo's back

    It proves I hate Jerry and Garrett
  6. junk

    Must see movies....

    Gone Girl? Gone Baby Gone was Casey Affleck from a couple of years ago.
  7. junk

    What are your thoughts after sleeping on it?

    Garrett has always been notoriously slow to adjust, but I thought we'd finally gotten him away from the offense I think the most troubling thing is that they went away from the run especially during key times. 35 rushes by backs against Seattle, 33 against NY, 23 last night. It wasn't like...
  8. junk

    RSS Feed

    Well so is dbair but we still keep him around
  9. junk

    RSS Feed

    Is there anyway to set up an RSS feed so that it'd automatically populate threads with the latest Cowboys stories?
  10. junk

    Hobbies

    Me and my rich friends like to influence political elections, invade small countries and hunt humans for sport I also like antiquing and garage sales
  11. junk

    Bob Sturm: Not being play-caller helping Jason Garrett

    Garrett has also said he wanted a more balanced offense, a two TE base, etc in the past and never did it. Wanting something and actually committing to it are two different things. Would we run this much if Garrett was calling plays? I really doubt it
  12. junk

    Bob Sturm: Not being play-caller helping Jason Garrett

    You're so smart, dbair It was a valid concern because he had been pass heavy and was chummy with Garrett. However, unlike Garrett, he had used the run in the past My bigger concern was that Linehan was a pretty run of the mill OC. However, his success here shows just how overmatched Garrett...
  13. junk

    Bob Sturm: Not being play-caller helping Jason Garrett

    I think that is the biggest impact so far. Garrett held the offense back and I think his involvement limited his effectiveness as a HC. It was too much for a coach who was under qualified for the job in the first place. Plus, he was too chummy with Romo and made it too easy for the offense to...
  14. junk

    2014 - The year the DCU Homered out?

    Part of the reason the defense is better is because they are actually being helped by the offense instead of being hung out to dry
  15. junk

    2014 - The year the DCU Homered out?

    I thought they'd be in that 7-9/8-8 range Didn't think they'd beat NO or Seattle but they both seem to have problems this year. The NFC East sucks though so you had to figure they'd be in the hunt to win the division Now that Garrett has been neutered offensively, they're winning the games...
  16. junk

    How the Cowboys drafted — and lucked — their way into one of NFL's best o- lines

    No mention of Shazier or how Martin was a fall back because they couldn't trade down to someone targeting Manziel and the guys they wanted were gone Now that it panned out, everyone wants to claim it was a plan. If rebuilding the OL was a plan, they would have invested more early picks...
  17. junk

    Sturm: Had Jerry Jones kept quiet about Manziel, he’d be getting some credit as GM

    Plus he had his own cereal. Come talk to me when you have your own cereal, Manziel.
  18. junk

    Who you got? Week 7

    Full homer mode engaged. Dallas wins easily
  19. junk

    Zack Martin better than Cowboys expected

    I liked Frederick but thought the end of 1 was early. It worked out though. Thought Martin was a great pick. Long term question is if you keep him at guard or move him to RT next year
  20. junk

    Are we good?

    That's what I was thinking
Top Bottom