The "97% consensus" comes from just one, discredited paper.
Plus, co2 is what plants feed on. Making bigger greener and more plants giving off more oxygen for us.It's worse than that. The study of climate papers was inherently biased. It's worse than that. The study looked at papers on climate change ignoring all paper on climate in general. No one would write a paper at that time that there is no climate change. That would be like reporting that a volcano is not erupting.
But you know what there is a consensus on among real climate scientists? Climate change is not an existential threat to humanity. Only the most left wing lunatics claim that climate change will destroy the planet. Most scientists that believe climate change is real believe some things will change for the worse but humanity will continue to flourish as we have for thousands of years. The reason the climate fanatics changed the theory on the Medieval Warming period is because it proved that a significant increase in the temperature of earth would benefit humans rather than extinguish us.
"New Ice Age" is far more scary than global warming or "climate change" I think. Would be way worse if it actually happened I think.We are having the coldest snowiest winter since 1978 when scientists claimed an ice age was imminent.
We are having the coldest snowiest winter since 1978 when scientists claimed an ice age was imminent.
"ICE AGE WOULDNT HAPPEN IF NOT FOR GAS POWERED CARS AND COW FARTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!""New Ice Age" is far more scary than global warming or "climate change" I think. Would be way worse if it actually happened I think.