That's not logical at all.
It means I wanted to provide an actual link that you requested.
I watched the statements from Noem yesterday. You asked for a link, so I went and got some. Then you complain that I went and got the links? That's pathetic. Be better than that dude.
I know the Guardian is shit. but the quotes/statements I referenced in that article were accurate, and in the video I also posted.
You guys are deflecting from facts with logical fallacies.
WTF is InternetKing? I've been on this site, and CZ, and the other site Reality created (Punndits -sp?) for awhile on politics and and a well known conservative.
There is no evidence at all that she "brandished" in ANY way.
What "headline" are you talking about? I didn't post a headline. The Guardian is irrelevant. It's just one of an infinite number of sources with the relevant quotes. The youtube video has them as well. You're deflecting.
And no, she is clearly specifically talking about this incident with this man when she says, "when you have someone showing up with weapons and are using them to assault law enforcement officers."
If she is talking in general (she is not, she is still on this singular incident), then that would be irresponsible as well as it would then not be applicable to this situation.
She goes from immediately criticizing him for showing up to a protest with a gun and not a sign (not digging the anti 2nd amendment aspect of that to be honest, but it's not important) to calling this SPECIFIC INSTANCE a violent riot because of??? "someone showing up with weapons and ****USING*** them to assault law enforcement officers." There was no switch to more generalized events. And there has been no other claims about others at the incidents using weapons. She was speaking of Pretti, and it is clear.
Miller posting on a non-government account is not really relevant either. He is in a high level position and making unfounded claims. It's not a good look. Just like it's not a good look for the left when crazed members of Congress make ridiculous claims about a 5 year old being kidnapped.
And when you say someone "approached the officers with a gun," you are suggesting the gun was a part of the approach, not that it was secured where it's lawfully supposed to be.
