of course the opposite of this is that we should carry every UDFA that shows a slight bit of promise on the active roster.
I don't think it's the opposite at all. That's you making a stupid leap for the sake of looking or trying to create a debate where none exist, essentially to attempt to jerk a chain and be an asshole. I just wanted him to explain why Radway should be on the PS, especially at this early juncture. And if Radway shows slight promise that reminisce(sp) of either Austin or Romo, then yes you try to make a place for him on the roster. Radway has so far, been having a good camp, and he had a good preseason game, if he conmntinues, why should he be relegated to PS fror some other team to snatch up? Look what happened with Matt Moore.
We've had success with UFDAs in the past. Fact is, once the pads are on and hitting, draft or undrafted position makes no difference.