Mass Democrat Corruption and Coup Tracker
- Thread starter dbair1967
- Start date
Dodger12
Super Moderator
- Messages
- 8,120
- Reaction score
- 5,543
You could be right....but then that would make it a whole nother crime and sets of charges.
At the end of the day, stuff like this is just sad for the country. Just think how much of a fucking degenerate deviant you have to be to commit this type of fraud that tears at the very fabric of the country. I still can't believe it to this day. I just can't hate these people enough and sometimes it's just not healthy.
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 26,616
- Reaction score
- 10,133
Dodger12
Super Moderator
- Messages
- 8,120
- Reaction score
- 5,543
I'm not convinced that Hammer and Scorecard was used in our elections but it certainly wouldn't surprise me in the least. For me, the fraudulent ballots and stuffing the ballot boxes with mail in votes is the bigger issue. Ballot harvesting is a bigger issue.....you just cannot see all the videos of people dropping dozens of ballots and not come away suspect.
And this is a bit interesting as well but I'd be interested in any analysis of the seized ballots. If I'm hearing the attachment right, there was manipulation of the hard drives after certification. Maybe we'll hear more about this but now we're getting into a technical area and the legality of those changes.
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 7,625
- Reaction score
- 7,121
Manufacture a Crisis. Raise Taxes. Repeat.
Zohran Mamdani does not need an excuse to grab your money—but he will always find a new one, and this week he got pretty creative.
Yesterday, the New York City mayor used the city’s deficit as justification for taxing the rich, while claiming that he wants to shift NYC’s “relationship to the state.” As it happens, Albany only exercised budgetary oversight of the city’s finances after Democratic mayors in the 1970s had wrecked the city budget.
In Mamdani’s world, the obvious way to fix deficits is not to spend less, but to tax people more. He even pushed NYC’s recent weather response as a rationale for taxing the wealthy, claiming that, “the city could start to get back on its feet…because we had a sanitation department that was staffed by thousands of people.”
Which raises an obvious question: how does Florida manage a pretty good sanitation department with a 0% state tax rate? The reality is that most of New York City’s money isn’t going toward picking up the garbage —but according to Mamdani, garbage pickup is the first thing that stops when the money stops flowing.
The goal for people like Zohran Mamdani is to make life unlivable; to blackmail your own citizens into giving you more of their money, and not for the basic things that any city ought to do, but for all the other crap. And then, the minute that you don't give them money, they take away the things the city ought to do and end up turning the place into a dumpster fire.
When Mamdani declared that NYC is in a “fiscal crisis at a scale greater than the Great Recession,” previous mayor Eric Adams ripped into him and rightfully so: “Here’s the part socialist hate saying out loud: “Free” is a lie. Every so-called free program comes with a price tag, and someone always pays for it.”
New York, you decided you wanted this guy, and now you got him.
The Daily Wire - Ben Shaprio
Zohran Mamdani does not need an excuse to grab your money—but he will always find a new one, and this week he got pretty creative.
Yesterday, the New York City mayor used the city’s deficit as justification for taxing the rich, while claiming that he wants to shift NYC’s “relationship to the state.” As it happens, Albany only exercised budgetary oversight of the city’s finances after Democratic mayors in the 1970s had wrecked the city budget.
In Mamdani’s world, the obvious way to fix deficits is not to spend less, but to tax people more. He even pushed NYC’s recent weather response as a rationale for taxing the wealthy, claiming that, “the city could start to get back on its feet…because we had a sanitation department that was staffed by thousands of people.”
Which raises an obvious question: how does Florida manage a pretty good sanitation department with a 0% state tax rate? The reality is that most of New York City’s money isn’t going toward picking up the garbage —but according to Mamdani, garbage pickup is the first thing that stops when the money stops flowing.
The goal for people like Zohran Mamdani is to make life unlivable; to blackmail your own citizens into giving you more of their money, and not for the basic things that any city ought to do, but for all the other crap. And then, the minute that you don't give them money, they take away the things the city ought to do and end up turning the place into a dumpster fire.
When Mamdani declared that NYC is in a “fiscal crisis at a scale greater than the Great Recession,” previous mayor Eric Adams ripped into him and rightfully so: “Here’s the part socialist hate saying out loud: “Free” is a lie. Every so-called free program comes with a price tag, and someone always pays for it.”
New York, you decided you wanted this guy, and now you got him.
The Daily Wire - Ben Shaprio
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 12,277
- Reaction score
- 6,926
I've always felt mail-in ballots were ripe for fraud. Its too easy to vote for someone else & next to impossible to prove
Do we know if the volume and methods for mail-in ballots changed significantly between 2020 and 2024?
If so, that would explain a lot
dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 68,112
- Reaction score
- 16,812
I say you need to think about how many globalists and piece of shit RINOs were in out and out opposition to almost everything he was doing during his first 4 yrs.
They tried to impeach him (wrongfully). They made up bullshit charges to prosecute him for (over and over and over). They tried to drain all his money so he would have no ability to run again. They tried to remove him from ballots. They tried to charge him with a fake insurrection. When all that failed they tried to assassinate him (at least twice that we know of) and they also assassinated someone who was getting massive interest and results for the party Trump ran.
"They" are not just Democrats. "They" are all the globalists, Rinos and Democrats, Marxists etc etc who knew their cash cow was coming to an end. They knew Trump would get them if he got a 2nd term.
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 26,616
- Reaction score
- 10,133
Plus, Trump in trying to get along with them, failed to clean house his first term. Allowing any number of them to plot behind his back while still insiders. Remember all the ridiculous leaks? Same mistake LBJ and Nixon made. Appeasement always backfires.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 12,277
- Reaction score
- 6,926
Even if everything you said is true, and I'm not disputing your claims, it completely whiffs as an answer to my question
dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 68,112
- Reaction score
- 16,812
it 100% answers it if you are paying attention
dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 68,112
- Reaction score
- 16,812
Started with the guy he picked as VP
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 26,616
- Reaction score
- 10,133
Orrrrr... was picked for him and he just went along.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 12,277
- Reaction score
- 6,926
Then you're gonna have to help me understand because I'm not seeing it, in fact you're answer as I interpret it, makes my point even stronger because if there were RINOs out to get him when he was president, they are presumably still there when Biden is in office but now Biden and all his psychos have control and can presumably rig the election even more than they were able to when Trump was in office.
What changed that prevented another rigging?
Things I can think of that could have made a difference are: COVID was long gone, people weren't as enflamed against Trump in 2024 as they were in 2020 as the MSM BS started to sink in with people willing to think plus mail-in ballots may not have been as ubiquitous in 2024 where as during COVID they were easily shipped in mass, coupled with people sitting on ass getting enraged by MSM anti-Trump talking points, they presumably had more motivation to vote (against Trump) but none of this is fraud.
As I said, main-in ballots are ripe for fraud so if the ease with which those were utilized in 2020 drastically reduced in 2024, this would explain a lot.
If bad actors had control of voting machines in 2020, how did they lose control by 2024?
I'm not saying there wasn't fraud but if I'm going to believe it and make the argument there was, I want to have facts and evidence on my side and since many here seem sure this is the case, I hoped y'all could help a brother out
Last edited: