Stephen Jones says team will look to add running back

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
By Rainer Sabin / Reporter
rsabin@dallasnews.com
7:36 pm on February 20, 2013 | Permalink


INDIANAPOLIS — The Cowboys rushing attack was feckless in 2012, accumulating 1,265 yards — the lowest total ever accumulated by a Dallas team during a 16-game season.

The woeful performance, Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones said, can be attributed to the fact that the offensive line was in flux and starter DeMarco Murray missed six games because of a sprained left foot. Compounding the problems were the struggles of Felix Jones, who failed to carry the load in Murray’s absence.

“Obviously Felix wasn’t as good as we would have liked,” Stephen Jones said Wednesday.

And Jones’ lack of productivity highlighted the need for a reliable backup who could fill in for the injury-prone Murray. Jones, who will be a free agent, is unlikely to return even though Stephen Jones said, “I wouldn’t shut the door on anybody.”

Asked if the Cowboys could draft a replacement for Jones, Stephen Jones said that is a real possibility.

“In this league, you have to have more than one back,” he said. “Obviously, we developed DeMarco Murray but you also have to look at the fact he hasn’t been healthy yet in terms of for a full season. I think we need a back. I like [Lance] Dunbar and I like [Phillip] Tanner but I think they’re more third backs than second backs.”

New running backs coach Gary Brown said last week he that he could see Murray benefiting from a partnership with a shifty tailback.

“You probably just want a guy that’s going to come in and complement him in the way maybe of just being, maybe more of a jitterbug type guy,” Brown said. “It’s hard to say. I’ve only been here a few days.”
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
Not bad thoughts, glad they're frank about Felix sucking


Bet theyd nut for Giovanni Bernard at 49 or wherever we pick in R2
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
This draft is loaded with backup RBs with some potential to be bigger than that. It is an interesting group this year for sure.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
22
A couple of things ...

1st ... although I agree with Stephen Jones that Tanner and Dunbar "are more third backs than second backs," it seems pretty cold for Jones to say that publicly about both players. That's needlessly harsh IMO.

2nd ... I'd much rather add a physical, short yardage, between the tackles type of RB to the team than a "shifty" "jitterbug type."
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
The only problem I have with the jitterbug comment, and the idea of looking for a complimentary back is, you're basically saying you're just drafting a back up.

Why not take the best running back, let there be a competition, and let the best man play?
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
I heard Brown say they might be looking for a RB with a little speed and wiggle to them, which I endorse, but we need another every down back behind Murray.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
22
The only problem I have with the jitterbug comment, and the idea of looking for a complimentary back is, you're basically saying you're just drafting a back up.

Why not take the best running back, let there be a competition, and let the best man play?

I agree with that.

The other problem with a jitterbug type is that we know Murray likely will miss at least a few games to injury every year. Do you really want to use the jitterbug as Murray's primary replacement? Probably not.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
I'm not convinced that Dunbar can't be that speed back that we seem to want...he just needs to be given an opportunity by the coach.
 
Top Bottom