Bob Sacamano
All-Pro
- Messages
- 26,436
- Reaction score
- 8
They were only stroking your ego.
i disagree they nailed the michael hamlin pick.
Stephen and ciskowski told all of us what a bright future he had and how he will play in the nickel sets right away.
Yes, I said earlier we've been better lately in the first 2 rounds.
GloryDays said that since DeCastro was not drafted in the Top 20 that no one had a a Top 20 grade on him. Which is not necessarily true. Teams grade players very differently. We had a Top 15 grade on Sean Lee and we got him much later. DeCastro could have been Top 20 on several teams boards. Supposedly, when he was available in the 20's, we tried to jump back up and grab him, willing to risk at least 2 more picks to make the move. Looks like it's possible we thought pretty highly of him.
I said nobody wanted him top 20..not that nobody had a top 20 grade on him. But regardless, whether he's a stud or not, taking him at 14 would have been a major fail.
Stephen Jones said it correctly, when he said, we would have traded down into the 20s if we were going to take DD..that's all I'm saying.
We had a 4th round grade on Skyler Green, Isaiah Stanbeck, Akwasi Owusu Ansah,
I'm reading that you believe cmd sucks. I agree.
lol, nah..CMD is my boy
Mine too. Even though he wishes that I were dead.
He didn't do that in college. Why would he do it in the pros?
I mean, this is a guy that benched the bar 36 times. So it's not anything a NFL strength and conditioning program will do for him. Like Mb4 said, he's maxed out, averaged out really, physically.
Just because he wasn't drafted top 20 doesn't mean no one wanted him in the top 20. We might have taken him in the top 20 if we didn't trade up, or if he was our preference at 14. If what cmd said was true, that we were trying to trade back up as he was slipping, then it would stand to reason we wanted him top 20. We just didn't want him at 6.I said nobody wanted him top 20..not that nobody had a top 20 grade on him. But regardless, whether he's a stud or not, taking him at 14 would have been a major fail.
Stephen Jones said it correctly, when he said, we would have traded down into the 20s if we were going to take DD..that's all I'm saying.
Just because he wasn't drafted top 20 doesn't mean no one wanted him in the top 20. We might have taken him in the top 20 if we didn't trade up, or if he was our preference at 14. If what cmd said was true, that we were trying to trade back up as he was slipping, then it would stand to reason we wanted him top 20. We just didn't want him at 6.
Still doesn't mean we didn't want him top 20. If we couldn't have traded down, or could only trade down to 19, we still might have taken him. Regardless, the point still stands that just because he wasn't taken top 20, no one wanted him top 20. Any one of the Top 10-15 teams could have wanted him top 20.S. jones said we would have traded down into the 20s to get him.
Facts are facts.. He didn't go top 20..this, top 15 would have been a reach
Still doesn't mean we didn't want him top 20. If we couldn't have traded down, or could only trade down to 19, we still might have taken him. Regardless, the point still stands that just because he wasn't taken top 20, no one wanted him top 20. Any one of the Top 10-15 teams could have wanted him top 20.
no u.The point still stands that you are just guessing.