dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,115
Reaction score
6,195
Its more than that, but I do agree with you about simply drafting the best RB they can (whatever round that is) and go from there.

That said, if you know the guy you are wanting as the #2 will mainly play in some 3rd down packages, you are looking for a guy who can learn/execute his pass blocking assignments as well as a guy with good hands, so that does sorta narrow the field some.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
I want the #2 RB to be good in the pass game, particularly picking up the blitzes, but I want a guy who can be a legit every down back if needed. You can coach a guy up in protection, but you can't teach a guy to be a natural RB. Every back we have does not have to be a swiss army knife.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
If Chris Ivory came cheap he'd be a nice pickup. That dude is tough. He's like a less flashy Marion Barber.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
That's the crazy thing. Tanner and Dunbar play well on special teams, look at least adequate when they get out there behind our shitty offensive line....but when asked for comments our FO says "Tanner and Dunbar are 3 backs" and "I like our offensive line".
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
What Zero said. Don't make the same mistake you did with Barber all over again and assume he's the guy who only needs a complement. Just get the best guy possible no matter the style. I still say Murray needs to change his bulldozer ways anyway, or he won't make it. Maybe he should try to be a little more elusive like he was in college and let a naturally bigger back be the hammer.
 

Cowboysrule122

Draft Pick
Messages
3,728
Reaction score
0
Running backs are a dime a dozen. Shit, I'd take Stefphon Jefferson from Nevada in the late rounds. Sleeper pick of the draft IMO.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
He should go undrafted. I would hate to spend a pick on a guy who might go undrafted...like Coale and Johnson last year.
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
He should go undrafted. I would hate to spend a pick on a guy who might go undrafted...like Coale and Johnson last year.

Johnson wasn't going undrafted. It was mentioned in multiple articles that NE was looking at him in the mid-rounds.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
Johnson wasn't going undrafted. It was mentioned in multiple articles that NE was looking at him in the mid-rounds.

Feh. Teams were trying to move up to get Quincy Carter too, if you believe that. Johnson should have gone undrafted.

Anyways...I hate to throw away picks late when you can take a chance on players that slipped instead of grabbing projects. Hanna was an excellent pick for us and filled a need. Even the gamble on Dennard by the Pats was solid IMO.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Johnson wasn't going undrafted. It was mentioned in multiple articles that NE was looking at him in the mid-rounds.

Are you sure it wasn't Philly, and not NE?

I remember Philly having interest, because I remember thinking how poorly they themselves evaluate safeties.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,115
Reaction score
6,195
Johnson wasn't going undrafted. It was mentioned in multiple articles that NE was looking at him in the mid-rounds.

I dont remember if New England was, but Philly definitely was and there was another team mentioned that I remember (it was Seattle or Chicago I believe)
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
Johnson wasn't going undrafted. It was mentioned in multiple articles that NE was looking at him in the mid-rounds.

I apologize for the "sources" but two guys (Cardinals scout and Seahawks assistant) told me their teams had him graded as an UDFA.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
multiple-sources.gif
 
Top Bottom