Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,399
Reaction score
3,794
All of those "injuries" shown are consistent with self-inflicted injuries, not assault wounds. The angle of the bruising as well as location of all wounds - none on the back or places she cannot reach. And these that are shown on the bottom of the arms appear consistent with bruising from someone that would strike edges of tables, walls, corners of walls etc. either when drunk or to cause minor bruising. The knuckles and hand injuries are of blunt force not defensive, from hitting walls or something hard similar to walls to bruise your own hand. The neck injury looks to be a light topical flesh wound, which is typical when self-inflicted because people typically don't do significant damage to their face and neck when inflicting self-injuries. The leg injury is consistent with an inside out injury and not from outside in.

One thing also to notice is none of these injuries are deep bruising. Which is interesting because when someone is being “abused out of anger” there is deep bruising in areas such as ribs, on their back, around the wrist, bruising from being choked not scratched on her neck, on the outside of the thighs from being hit not on the inside of the thigh unless sexual assault occurs. And again, no facial wounds out of anger?

When one inflicts self-injuries for whatever reason, they usually can only tolerate so much self-inflicted pain on themselves therefore they cause only light bruising like these wounds and not deep tissue bruising. The reason is simple, the pain is just too severe to self-inflict a wound showing deep bruising. And the reason for self-injury is usually attention, money, or some type of manipulation so severe pain is not worth the end result.

It’s very easy to see how she got these minor bruises and why 4 witnesses said no assault took place. This is for money, attention or manipulation of some sort.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,053
Reaction score
6,169
Sounding like this woman has brought false charges. I hope they throw her under the jail if true.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
Mr. B, I've just about seen it all. Woman can be nuts. Throw in the potential for money, and things get crazier.

You and me both! It's like the prettier they are the crazier they are.

Money is an amazing motivator for bringing out the crazy in women.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
All of those "injuries" shown are consistent with self-inflicted injuries, not assault wounds. The angle of the bruising as well as location of all wounds - none on the back or places she cannot reach. And these that are shown on the bottom of the arms appear consistent with bruising from someone that would strike edges of tables, walls, corners of walls etc. either when drunk or to cause minor bruising. The knuckles and hand injuries are of blunt force not defensive, from hitting walls or something hard similar to walls to bruise your own hand. The neck injury looks to be a light topical flesh wound, which is typical when self-inflicted because people typically don't do significant damage to their face and neck when inflicting self-injuries. The leg injury is consistent with an inside out injury and not from outside in.

One thing also to notice is none of these injuries are deep bruising. Which is interesting because when someone is being “abused out of anger” there is deep bruising in areas such as ribs, on their back, around the wrist, bruising from being choked not scratched on her neck, on the outside of the thighs from being hit not on the inside of the thigh unless sexual assault occurs. And again, no facial wounds out of anger?

When one inflicts self-injuries for whatever reason, they usually can only tolerate so much self-inflicted pain on themselves therefore they cause only light bruising like these wounds and not deep tissue bruising. The reason is simple, the pain is just too severe to self-inflict a wound showing deep bruising. And the reason for self-injury is usually attention, money, or some type of manipulation so severe pain is not worth the end result.

It’s very easy to see how she got these minor bruises and why 4 witnesses said no assault took place. This is for money, attention or manipulation of some sort.

According to Zeke he believes those bruises also came from a bar fight she was in the same night. I understand it's he said/she said at this point but a crazy chic getting into a bar fight is pretty good reason for dumping her. Especially when you're a 21 year old millionaire.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,053
Reaction score
6,169
Witnesses, including another female said Elliott didn't act with any violence towards his girlfriend.
 

onlyonenow

In the Rotation
Messages
526
Reaction score
1
her story is falling apart fast. But the damage is done. EE will have this around his neck for the rest of his life with POS's like Christine Brennan around.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,053
Reaction score
6,169
He was smart to save those messages on his phone if that part of the story is true.
 

NoMoRedJ

UDFA
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
56
Sounds like Zeke replaces one ho with another ho to polish his knob and replaced ho isnt happy so its payback time.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
Hopefully this really shows him how fast shit can go south and keeps him on the straight and narrow. Or at least makes him keep his circle small and leery of a pretty face and fat ass.
 
Messages
4,604
Reaction score
0
National writer: Let authorities shed more light on Ezekiel Elliott situation before you lump him in with NFL's abuse problem
By SportsDayDFW.com

With another high-profile NFL player getting hit with accusations of domestic violence, it could be very easy for the court of public opinion to find him guilty before all of the facts have been uncovered.

On Friday, Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott emphatically denied such accusations against him that came from a Columbus, Ohio woman who claimed to be his live-in girlfriend.

Sporting News' Zac Al-Khateeb notes in a recent article that Elliott should not automatically be lumped in with the likes of Ray Rice, former Cowboy Greg Hardy, and Johnny Manziel as part of a league suffering their own issues with domestic violence saying that 'the failures of those organizations and players are their own, not Elliott's. And at this point, he has only been accused -- not charged, tried or convicted.'

Elliott has not been arrested or charged of any crime due to conflicting witness statements, and his father has come out to defend his son saying, "Ezekiel has done nothing wrong."

Given recent displays of Elliott's character - such as donating the proceeds for custom cleats he wore during the NFL combine to abuse victims - Al-Khateeb also says, 'Perhaps it's best to let authorities shed light on the matter before the rest of us find him guilty by association.'
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,053
Reaction score
6,169
So apparently the police basically looked at this and said "there's nothing to see here" but now the NFL office is going to mount a "detailed investigation"

Can someone explain to me exactly what the league would be "investigating" and why?
 
Top Bottom