OBJ at 16

boozeman

boozeman

Draft Pick
Messages
3,859
Reaction score
0
Jon88 said:
Uh, no. We need help on OL and DL.
Keep reading...
Uh if the best talent on the DL and OL are gone, why take a lesser player just because of where they play.

To me, the BPA approach is exactly what I do in this draft with the talent level it has.

Start reaching for DL again, we will end up with the next Ebenezer Ekuban.

I would have to see who is still left before I say absolutely not to Beckham.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,087
Reaction score
6,189
GloryDaysRBack said:
what you guys think?

WR LSU for those who dont know who he is
Keep reading...

It'll be interesting to see what happens if Donald and Barr are both gone. If they get stuck at 16 and Beckham is the highest rated player, its kinda hard to argue with taking him for themselves if they cant move down (which is what I expect us to do, move down)

There's only one QB I'd take in the first rd (Bortles). I wouldn't take a RB or TE in the first rd, or a CB, or a MLB. Everything else I think it could be argued makes sense for us. OT, OG, WR, DE, DT, OLB and safety.
 
NoShame

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
dbair1967 said:
We wont be drafting any CB's in the first couple rounds
Keep reading...

I wouldn't say the first two but when Orlando scandrick is currently your best cb you definitely have to keep ur options open.

But IF it came down to WR or CB in the first.. I'm taking a corner.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,087
Reaction score
6,189
NoShame said:
I wouldn't say the first two but when Orlando scandrick is currently your best cb you definitely have to keep ur options open.

But IF it came down to WR or CB in the first.. I'm taking a corner.
Keep reading...

I'm not, not in this draft.

We have a lot of resources already committed to CB. At WR we have Dez (who now has two years of minor back issues) and a guy we picked in the third rd to go along with a couple of guys who are nothing more than slot type 3rd or 4th WR's.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,087
Reaction score
6,189
NoShame said:
Hell no to wr in the first round. Fix the fuckin trenches already.
Keep reading...

I don't think their intent is to do anything different, but if you get to 16, get stuck and cant trade down and there's no value at DL or OL, then you move onto to the highest rated other positions of concern.

That said, I think guys like Broaddus and Spagnola are putting some of this stuff out there at someone else's direction, because I think they really would want to trade down if the DL's they like are gone and they know there's a number of teams towards the bottom of the first round that want WR's badly.
 
UVAwahoos

UVAwahoos

2
Messages
4,952
Reaction score
0
The one sure thing is that Jerry is going to fuck up this pick, so if the dude doesn't make sense, I'm sure he's high on our board.
 
Everlastingxxx

Everlastingxxx

2
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
Sure why not. He is little but has good hands and can return punts. I say fuck the defense. No matter who is drafted the defense will suck.
 
J

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
boozeman said:
Uh if the best talent on the DL and OL are gone, why take a lesser player just because of where they play.

To me, the BPA approach is exactly what I do in this draft with the talent level it has.

Start reaching for DL again, we will end up with the next Ebenezer Ekuban.

I would have to see who is still left before I say absolutely not to Beckham.
Keep reading...

That's when you trade down. Taking a wide reciever would be absolutely crazy.

Trading down last year and taking Williams is looking really good right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom