ThoughtExperiment
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 9,906
- Reaction score
- 3
They lost by 3.
The 2007 team lost by 4. I don't remember anyone cutting them any slack because the game was close.
They lost by 3.
Keeping Zeke on the sidelines in the red zone had more to do with the loss than hypothetical linemen.
So are you saying the defense played great and has zero accountability for this loss?
I think it's retarded to take him out on 3rd downs. I mean, he's a very good receiver for a back for crying out loud. With all the pub Leveon is getting for how many touches he gets a game running and receiving, they should have been aware that they have that exact same back on the squad.
The 2007 team lost by 4. I don't remember anyone cutting them any slack because the game was close.
No. You're putting words into my mouth. Said no such thing. But I refuse to believe that anything the defense did or didn't do trumps what Garrett did on that series. You said it yourself we lost by 3, well I showed you where we left 4 points at.
Then let's here your thoughts on how the defense failed in this game.
Did we all just watch the same game?
2nd straight game (I am not counting Philly, because they treated it like a preseason game) where the defense gave up three TD's on the first three drives. That's awful by itself.
Rodgers is sensational and he should get a lot of credit, he makes a lot of throws that most QB's arnt capable of making. But our defense was atrocious and the play to essentially end the game was epic defense fail. They had a chance to at least ensure OT and with the other team starting on their own 25 and getting them to 3rd and 20 after a great sack, they blew it.