JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
Big shocker....

Time for them to lie in the bed of shit they created.

Congressional leaders of both parties in the House and Senate are trying to exempt themselves--and their staffs--from Obamacare's health insurance exchanges they will be mandated to join under the law. This would be a devastating indictment of Obamacare and the Democrats who rammed it through. Republicans may give Democrats cover if they join them in agreeing to the exemptions.

According to a Politico report, the "high-level" talks involve Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), the Obama administration and other "top lawmakers," and both sides are "acutely aware of the potential for political fallout from giving carve-outs from the hugely controversial law to 535 lawmakers and thousands of their aides."

Noting the important role that Republican lawmakers have in the talks, a source told Politico that, “Everyone has to hold hands on this and jump, or nothing is going to get done.”

Michael Steel, a Boehner spokesman, told Politico that Boehner's "objective is to spare the entire country from the ravages of the president’s health care law. He is approached daily by American citizens, including members of Congress and staff, who want to be freed from its mandates. If the speaker has the opportunity to save anyone from Obamacare, he will.”

Congress's approval ratings are at near historic lows, and such an exemption would make them look like hypocrites and seem more out of touch for holding themselves--and their staffers--to "a different standard than the people who put them in office."

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), one of Obamacare's chief architects, though, insisted there would not be any additional costs to lawmakers and their aides because the federal government would still subsidize insurance bought on the exchanges. Others are less clear, which is why they have been discussing the exemptions.

If Waxman is wrong and the federal government does not subsidize the health insurance plans, Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) said it would have a "devastating" impact on staffers who would take a $7,000-a-year hit, but he did add that he had "no problems with Congress being under the same guidelines" because if Obamacare is going to be such a disaster, "we ought to enjoy it together with our constituents.”

Republicans in 2010 insisted that Congress should have the same healthcare as the American people while President Barack Obama vowed to join the healthcare exchange. Those on Committees, though, will not have to get their healthcare through the exchange. Staffers in the lawmaker's state or district would have to join their state's exchanges and D.C. staff would most likely join D.C., Maryland, or Virginia healthcare exchanges.

According to the report, lawmakers are weighing whether to exempt themselves and their aides or just their staffers.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...ng-to-Exempt-Themselves-Staffs-from-Obamacare
 

MetalHead

In the Rotation
Messages
531
Reaction score
0
breitbart? really?

you listen to limbaugh and beck don't you?

So,if HuffPo doesn't report it,is not true,right?
Oh and by the way,Breitbart was just vindicated for the Pigford farmer fraud,but you wouldn't know,would you?


NYT: Breitbart was right about Pigford
posted at 9:21 am on April 26, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

It’s rare to get this kind of vindication, so let’s enjoy it in memory of Andrew Breitbart for as long as possible. For more than two years, Andrew and Lee Stranahan have investigated the Pigford settlement and the fraudulent claims that not only have cost taxpayers billions, but have left the original black farmers who sued the USDA over discrimination in the lurch. Today the New York Times reports what Andrew and Lee have been saying all along — that the Pigford settlement was a political hack job by Tom Vilsack’s Department of Agriculture, and that it’s a magnet for fraud
 
Last edited:

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,065
Reaction score
6,180
more proof of the hypocrites that run this country..."we can subject you regular people to all sorts of garbage, but we wont have to do that"
 
Messages
4,604
Reaction score
0
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...s-trying-to-exempt-itself-from-obamacare.html

Is Congress Trying to Exempt Itself From Obamacare?
by Megan McArdle Apr 25, 2013 10:25 AM EDT

The new health care law requires Congress to buy insurance through the exchanges. That may be a problem.

Bit of a stir this morning, as Politico reports that Congress is considering exempting its staff from an Obamacare provision which will require all congressmen and staffers to get their health insurance through the exchanges. Apparently, it's not clear that the government is authorized to actually pay for this insurance, meaning that the folks on Capitol Hill might have to buy insurance out of their own pocket. (The ruling from the Office of Personnel Management, which governs this sort of question, is still pending.)

As you can imagine, Congress and their staffers are not happy about the prospect of paying for their own health insurance. So Politico reports that they're discussing maybe getting together and offering themselves a little relief from the law. Apparently, it's a lot easier to get Congress to talk about exempting themselves from Obamacare than it is to get them to talk about exempting the millions of other Americans who will be affected.

Ezra Klein argues that no, they're not talking about exempting themselves from Obamacare, just this specific provision, which Klein calls "a drafting error". In response to which, I'd offer two observations:

First, this is, in fact, about exempting themselves from Obamacare. This is a provision of Obamacare. It is in the bill. You may think that it shouldn't be in the bill, or that it shouldn't be in the bill in the way that it's written. But--assuming that these discussions are actually happening--Congress is considering exempting itself from the one provision of the bill that actually directly affects Congress. As far as they're concerned, this is exempting themselves from Obamacare; the rest of the bill affects Hill staffers only indirectly.

Furthermore, this exemption is important. There are very good reasons to require Congress to "eat their own cooking", especially on a big bill like this. At least one source in the Politico article says that they're considering junking this provision entirely and moving Congress and staffers back to the federal employee benefits system. This would be good for them, but bad for the rest of us, and they should be ashamed to even consider it.

The second point I'd make is that there seems to be a growing consensus among Obamacare's supporters that all problems with the law are due to either Republican opposition, or "drafting errors". No tax subsidies in the bill for federal exchanges? Drafting error. Implementation running behind? Don't blame HHS, blame Republicans. You would think that the PPACA had delegated responsibility for implementation to the Republican National Committee, rather than the Department of Health and Human Services.

Opponents have long been saying that the bill was basically one long drafting error, and now its supporters seem to be suggesting that they're right. Have we now arrived at a point where the optimistic case for the bill that was an incredibly sloppy first draft that obviously required the active cooperation of the opposition to make it work? And if so, has this made anyone question the wisdom of passing it in the first place? If you want to get to the other side of a deep ravine, and the only way to do so is to ride a unicycle across a tightrope while juggling burning torches, maybe it's time to rethink your goal. And if you decide to go ahead, you probably shouldn't blame anyone else if you go down in flames.

Of course, this particular fooforaw may be a tempest in a teapot: OPM may rule that they can offer subsidies to staffers. But we shouldn't forget this. If Congress wants to exempt itself from the Obamacare exchanges, it should go ahead and offer the same relief to everyone else. There are a lot of people out there at risk of losing their employer health insurance and being forced onto the exchanges. Surely they deserve the same consideration as Congress.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Congress is trying to repeal the air traffic controller cuts that were part of the sequester deal because all their flights were delayed when they took their breaks.
 
Top Bottom