cboys72
2
That's what the need whores are telling you to do. Reach for a player.
Need whores?
Say what you want if luck is on the board when we pick we will be fielding several trade offers and we wont be drafting him.....
That's what the need whores are telling you to do. Reach for a player.
Yea, correct me if I'm wrong here but didn't the Pats draft Mayo at 10 with Flacco still on the board. Not sure which players went in between there but I'd say that "take the franchise QB when you already have one no matter what" theory goes out the window seeing as the Pats didn't do it.
I think you need pussy in your life.
Flacco wasn't a top 10 projection.
Not close to a top 10 projection.
So your point is?
That's the response I expected.
And that would be best case scenario for us.
I'm not talking about trading down 10 picks here... Just a few and we should be able to pick up a couple extra high picks... possibly a quality vet, and still get a guy we were targeting at our original slot.
Simply noting the fact that he is a franchise QB.
Relax, there's no need to take offense to that. I'm just saying...
Goose: When you're drafting in the Top 10, you can never go wrong taking the best player on your board. In the second, third and fourth rounds I'd try to address needs. But never, ever, ever pass up a blue-chip player at the top of a draft to fill a need with a lesser player at a need position. You win championships with blue-chip players. You get them in the Top 10 of drafts.
http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/12/gosselin-if-stanford-qb-andrew.html
We have your parting gifts at the door.
There's one position I know we won't draft with our top ten pick, and that's another WR.
If we do it better be A.J. Green. But I'd rather not go that route unless he's BPA.
Taking another receiver would be retarded. BPA or not.
Retarded? Yeah, it's Jerry logic.
Appearantly it's your logic as well.
I didn't say I wanted a WR , you fuckhead.
If we do it better be A.J. Green. But I'd rather not go that route unless he's BPA.
Oh, so you're simply pointing out something that has no bearing of the discussion at hand.
And you don't understand why it isn't relevant to the topic because you're bringing a knife to a gun fight.
What you did is prove your low IQ.
That's what a moron does. When they're challenged intellectually, they go right to the childish responses. It's all they have.
I was making a general comment in regards to the discussion.
Flacco is a franchise QB who was passed over by the Patriots. He was drafted 18. 8 slots after the Pats picked.
Your whole point in this thread is that if a franchise QB were available, you take him. No matter what.
This discussion has been over. Alls we're doing now is repeating ourselves. Intellectual responses are done with when you're dealing with a stubborn know-it-all.
You think you're an NFL GM with years of experience stating your opinion as fact. While the rest of us are simply saying what we would and what makes sense.
I said you needed pussy in your life for one reason which can be found on the top of page 5. Your response was pathetic and actually depressing. I know your type. You live on these message boards. Probably an active member on about 10. Banned from a few others. You think you have a reputation over the internet thats means something. And you're 30 something. Maybe 40. But hey, keep "challenging morons intellectually" by all means.
My whole point in this thread is if a team is on the clock and a QB is sitting there at the top of their board as the clear BPA, a well run team will take that player.
Not if some 2nd or 3rd round projection happens to pan out and become a franchise QB down the road. Which I don't even know if you can call Flacco that yet.
So your point is you have none. You countered with something that had no bearing to what I'm correctly saying.
Or when you run out of ammo.
Start collecting rocks.
I'm saying what I would and what makes sense. You're saying the opposite. I think I'm an NFL GM. You're cool.
The mind of a 12 year old.
You said it because you can't hang in an intellectual debate. So you go with the typical troll moron response with no redeeming value whatsoever.
What you want to do is steer the topic away from you being incorrect into a flame war. Won't happen. My song. You dance to it.
So.....as Goose has correctly pointed out, any GM worth their own salt takes that QB in that situation. He's basically saying you're an idiot.
What's your response?
lol Come on. I can sit here and just as easily discredit anything you say.
I threw the Flacco situation out there. You make excuses to help your argument.