ThoughtExperiment
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 9,906
- Reaction score
- 3
I happened on this other forum that had a big thread on Terrence Williams vs Devin Street. I guess Dooley said some positive things about Street, and the theme of that thread is basically that Williams sucks and Street is going to be a big upgrade once he learns the game.
Now I like Williams, but that doesn't mean I'm not objective about how good he is. No, he's not a superstar player. Yes, we'd have been better off drafting the Cal WR over him. But I think he's been pretty good his first two years given what he is and how many weapons have to share the ball on this offense. And he is coming off a very productive playoff season. Most of all, I think Street is a complete spare. Looks to me like he's a big, slow possession WR who offers little. Williams was a higher draft pick, he's faster, he's about the same size, and he was much more productive his rookie year.
What am I missing in people thinking Street would be some big upgrade? Or is this a case of that board not having a clue?
Now I like Williams, but that doesn't mean I'm not objective about how good he is. No, he's not a superstar player. Yes, we'd have been better off drafting the Cal WR over him. But I think he's been pretty good his first two years given what he is and how many weapons have to share the ball on this offense. And he is coming off a very productive playoff season. Most of all, I think Street is a complete spare. Looks to me like he's a big, slow possession WR who offers little. Williams was a higher draft pick, he's faster, he's about the same size, and he was much more productive his rookie year.
What am I missing in people thinking Street would be some big upgrade? Or is this a case of that board not having a clue?