Jerry: Doug Free at guard could be fixture

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
August, 29, 2013

By Tim MacMahon | ESPNDallas.com


ARLINGTON, Texas – Jerry Jones sounds like he’s figured out what he believes is the Dallas Cowboys' best combination of five offensive linemen.

Jones strongly hinted that he envisions the Cowboys entering the season with an offensive line featuring Tyron Smith at left tackle, Ronald Leary at left guard, Travis Frederick at center, Doug Free at left guard and Jermey Parnell at right tackle.

Jones shied away from stating unequivocally if that was the Cowboys’ best five, but he indicated that the team’s interest in signing a starting-caliber guard such as Brian Waters waned after evaluating Free’s performance in Saturday’s preseason game.

“We’ve got to be a little guarded because Free was nothing short of amazing to come in and play at the level he played,” Jones said. “You’d have to be real careful making a pretty significant commitment relative just to the cap standpoint at this juncture, relative to looking to the future.

“Amazing that he played how he played not having played the position before, but playing at a level that we can win with.”

Jones left little doubt that Leary, whom the Cowboys expect to recover from arthroscopic knee surgery in time to play in the Sept. 8 opener, would return as the starter at left guard.

“Play ‘em both,” Jones said of Leary and Free, adding that Parnell had proven he can start at right tackle, leaving Mackenzy Bernadeau as the odd man out. “I would hope that Leary comes back, and should as a starter. That’s the way he left. Play ‘em both.”

If the Cowboys go with the group Jones suggests could be the best-case scenario, Smith would be the team’s lone first-team offensive lineman with so much as a single NFL start at his current position. And he’s far from a grizzled veteran at age 22, having played left tackle last season for the first time since his high school years.

Frederick, a first-round pick like Smith, has given the Cowboys reason to believe he’ll be able to step right in and be solid at center. He’s wise beyond his years, but he’s still a rookie.

Leary went undrafted a year ago and spent his rookie season on the practice squad before being called up for the final game, when he was inactive. And he’ll have to chip off a few weeks of rust before making his regular-season NFL debut.

Parnell, 27, made a fill-in start at left tackle last season and played about a third of the snaps at right tackle in the final four games. You could make the case that Parnell is the least experienced offensive lineman on the team, considering he was a college basketball player at Ole Miss and never played offensive line until the Saints signed him as an undrafted project in 2009 and stashed him on their practice squad.

Free, 29, the graybeard of the group, has 55 games of starting experience at the two tackle spots but had never played a snap at guard until last week. His experience at guard consists of six days of practice and one half’s worth of work in a preseason game.

“I think we’re better in the offensive line than any time in the last two or three years,” Jones said last week.

That’s the epitome of faint praise, more of a statement about the inferior lines of recent years than anything. The fact of the matter is the Cowboys hope an unproven unit can be adequate.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
Hard to know if Jerry is dead serious here (entirely possible) or is strengthening his negotiating position with Waters.

I strongly dislike Jerry proclaiming who should or shouldn't be starting. That should be a coaching decision and one that Garrett announces.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
But I thought this was a precautionary move for emergency only

Yup, that's what I thought. I thought Leary and Bernadeau would be the starting guards and the team was seeing if Free could fill in if/when either got hurt.

I might have been wrong.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
62,099
Reaction score
12,038
Bernadeau has played so bad, that it warrants someone replacing him.

That said, I'll be surprised if Free doesnt have some games with significant struggles if he plays RG all the time.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Bernadeau has played so bad, that it warrants someone replacing him.

That said, I'll be surprised if Free doesnt have some games with significant struggles if he plays RG all the time.

He'll be better than Bernadeau.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
6
Hard to know if Jerry is dead serious here (entirely possible) or is strengthening his negotiating position with Waters.
Oh, I believe Jerry is 100% genuine here. You know how he is, he's so overly optimistic that it just takes a sliver of positive evidence for his 40 year old mind to run wild with the dream that Free will be this great guard for the next five or six years.

Anyway, say Free does stay at guard. The other part, probably more important part, is are we really so sure Parnell is going to be a good tackle? That's a pretty important position, a lot more than guard.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
Bernadeau has played so bad, that it warrants someone replacing him.

That said, I'll be surprised if Free doesnt have some games with significant struggles if he plays RG all the time.

I don't know what to believe about who is playing o.k. and who isn't. It seemed like Bernadeau was getting fairly decent reviews once he returned this preseason, and then .... The reviews of Arkin are especially confusing. First he was being damned by faint praise by Garrett, then a couple of games ago several sources were saying that Arkin exceeded expectations and actually did an o.k. job. Then the next week he's replaced by Free.

I realize that the quick answer is that all of the guards suck (with the possible exception of Leary, who hasn't really played enough to be declared adequate or inadequate). But there is an unusual amount of mixed messages about these guys.


Oh, I believe Jerry is 100% genuine here. You know how he is, he's so overly optimistic that it just takes a sliver of positive evidence for his 40 year old mind to run wild with the dream that Free will be this great guard for the next five or six years.

That's true. It also could be that Jerry both believes in Free and is trying to negotiate with Waters.

More likely, I'm just engaging in wishful thinking ... hoping that the team will acquire a new guard.

Anyway, say Free does stay at guard. The other part, probably more important part, is are we really so sure Parnell is going to be a good tackle? That's a pretty important position, a lot more than guard.

Clearly.
 

Mr.Po

2
Messages
2,711
Reaction score
0
Hard to know if Jerry is dead serious here (entirely possible) or is strengthening his negotiating position with Waters.

Don't question the mind of a 40 y/o.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
14
Got lambasted at the Zone and at KFFL for suggesting Free at guard a few months ago. One poster at the Zone defended that Free is not a potential role player for the O-line or athlete at all with this statement: "because we have eyes".
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Got lambasted at the Zone and at KFFL for suggesting Free at guard a few months ago. One poster at the Zone defended that Free is not a potential role player for the O-line or athlete at all with this statement: "because we have eyes".

That place is a joke and always has been.
 
Top Bottom