Bob Sturm: Cowboys' loss shows Brandon Weeden is out of his league

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,275
Reaction score
2,520
Bob Sturm: Cowboys' loss shows Brandon Weeden is out of his league

1443387834-NS_27COWSPREGAME44_46329261.JPG


Overall thoughts

They needed to play mistake-free and not give away anything today to have a chance to beat a pretty good football team. Despite a lot of things going well in the early going, it was not close to a clean performance to end the day happy. The defense was disappointing. Most of us expected the offense to be disappointing. The defense had no answer to the Falcons' run game -- that we certainly did not fear entering the day -- and all of the problems Julio Jones causes. And put those together you have what you have: a very disappointing result and a second half where the Cowboys were beat up pretty badly on both sides of the ball.

Brandon Weeden didn't attempt many passes downfield; rate his performance

You can tell either Weeden or the coaches or both don't want him making any throws that would be regarded as medium or high levels of difficulty. He threw 26 passes and I remember (two long ones) -- the seam route to Jason Witten, that was a high pass and a slant to Terrance Williams. Otherwise everything was within five yards of the line of scrimmage, and the Falcons adjusted appropriately. Once that happened, the Cowboys had an offense that had zero explosiveness. They were going to have to run the football right down the Falcons throats, and the Falcons would not have that. They stacked the box and quieted that idea in the second half.

Should the Cowboys have thrown more downfield?

Yes. Oh yes. That was their only chance -- catch the Falcons not taking their passing game seriously. And the time to try that is first down. I am pretty sure they never passed on first and they were pretty clear with their gameplan, which was try to work with a quarterback who can't run an NFL offense very well. The more we think about it, we should have seen that last week when they traded for Matt Cassel. Not that Cassel can do magic tricks. They were pretty sure what Brandon Weeden could not do.

Is there QB controversy now?

I'm not sure it's a controversy as much as it's trying to survive and win a few games between now and Nov. 22 (when Tony Romo is slated to return). There certainly is some hesitancy to be running Weeden out there many more times. You just cant have a 21-7 lead and throw that interception, and you can't slide in the backfield when you're down to your last chance and try to avoid contact. That probably right there, that play where it's third down and short and he's sliding for self-preservation, that will leave the coaches looking quickly into alternatives.

On the Cowboys' defense:

The Falcons, entering the game, decided to challenge the Cowboys defense physically. They lined up with a fullback and wanted some power runs right into the teeth of the Cowboys. As they hop on an airplane and head back to Georgia with a win, that was pretty successful all day long. That of course led to some favorable third down situations where they could use Jones to make the Cowboys secondary look rather hapless. So that two-pronged attack probably led many of us to curb our enthusiasm about the upgrades on the Cowboys defense until they receive help from reinforcements.

What should fans take away heading into a game next week at New Orleans, which might not have Drew Brees?

The takeaway is this is going to be very difficult without Romo and Dez Bryant. It places a massive premium on getting that win next Sunday against New Orleans, if the idea is to try to be near .500 when Romo returns, it's possible the season might depend on next Sunday night. I doubt the Patriots and Seahawks (two future Cowboys opponents) will have a tough time with this offense.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
That INT was vintage Romo though; scrambling, keeping your eyes downfield and then hoping to launch the ball to the target (Witten). Problem was is that he didn't get his feet set, so the ball just sailed on him. Then the rest of the game he did what he usually does after bad things happen to him. He said fuck the low percentage throws, I'm playing it safe.

Do we really want Matt Cassel starting? He has no arm so all of his stuff is going to be intermediate throws too.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Sturm is okay, he at least makes an effort, but I'm starting to think he's one of the most overrated "geniuses" anywhere.

Weeden threw the one bad pick, but he wasn't the reason we lost. I think he pretty much executed the game plan the coaches wanted, which was for him to play it pretty safe and not make too many mistakes.

But the offense still put up 28 points. It was our incredibly pre-anointed defense that lost the game. That was just pathetic getting gashed all day by an unknown RB.

And our "greatest ever" O-line didn't help much either after a great start.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Yeah, I thought the Oline had a heart-to-heart during the week after looking pretty pedestrian the past 2 weeks. Seeing as how they performed in the 1st half today.

I guess they need another one.
 
Top Bottom